Archive for category: Psychology Assignment Help

This is a paper that is focusing on the student to explain psychological concepts in the patient’s presentation. The paper also provides additional information to use in the writing of the assignment paper well and precisely.

Explain psychological concepts in the patient’s presentation

For this assignment, students will investigate and propose a psychiatric diagnosis based on the case study from the Gorenstein and Comer (2015) textbook Case Studies in Abnormal Psychology, chosen in the Week One “Initial Call” discussion. This paper will include an in-depth overview of the disorder(s) within the diagnosis, treatment options for the diagnosis, and a sound rationale that explains why this diagnosis was made. Note that the diagnosis may include more than one psychiatric disorder.

The paper must present a thorough overview of each disorder within the diagnosis. Assume the audience has no prior knowledge of the disorder(s) within the diagnosis, and provide relevant and easy to understand explanations of each for the readers. When writing the paper, it is critical to convey all the necessary information in a straightforward manner using non-technical language. (Reference the Professional Voice and Writing resource provided by the Ashford Writing Center for assistance.) Support the analysis with at least five peer-reviewed sources published within the last ten years in addition to the course text.

Explain psychological concepts in the patient’s presentation

The Psychiatric Diagnosis topical paper must include the following:

Explain psychological concepts in the patient’s presentation using professional terminology. Identify symptoms and behaviors exhibited by the patient in the chosen case study.
Match the identified symptoms to potential disorders in a diagnostic manual.
Propose a diagnosis based on the patient’s symptoms and the criteria listed for the disorder(s) in the diagnostic manual.

Analyze and explain how the patient meets criteria for the disorder(s) according to the patient’s symptoms and the criteria outlined in the diagnostic manual.
Justify the use of the chosen diagnostic manual (i.e., Why was this manual chosen over others?).
Summarize general views of the diagnosis from multiple theoretical orientations and historical perspectives. Include a discussion on comorbidity if the diagnosis includes more than one disorder.
Evaluate symptoms within the context of an appropriate theoretical orientation for this diagnosis.

Use at least two peer-reviewed articles to assess the validity of this diagnosis, and describe who is most likely to have the diagnosis with regard to age, gender, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, and ethnicity. Provide a brief evaluation of the scientific merit of these peer-reviewed sources in the validity assessment.
Summarize the risk factors (i.e., biological, psychological, and/or social) for the diagnosis. If one of the categories is not relevant, address this within the summary.

Compare evidence-based and non-evidence-based treatment options for the diagnosis.
Evaluate well-established treatments for the diagnosis, and describe the likelihood of success or possible outcomes for each treatment.
Create an annotated bibliography of five peer-reviewed references published within the last ten years to inform the diagnosis and treatment recommendations. In the annotated bibliography, write a two- to three-sentence evaluation of the scientific merit of each of these references. For additional assistance with this portion of the assignment, access the Ashford Writing Center’s Sample Annotated Bibliography.

This is a paper that requires the student to analyze treatment in correctional facilities forensic psychology development . The paper also provides additional information to use in the writing of the assignment paper. Below is the assessment description to focus on as you write:

Treatment in correctional facilities forensic psychology development

Instructions

Skills Builder 6.1: How to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography
Throughout your studies, you will read many texts and journal articles. In many courses, you will be asked to prepare an annotated bibliography to assist you in preparing key assignments.

Begin this process by reading about annotated bibliographies in the Conducting Research and also Forms of Writing sections in the Northcentral Academic Success Center. (click the links in the left side navigation area of the ASC screen).

How to prepare an annotated bibliography: The annotated bibliography. (2015, December 8). Cornell University Library.
Stacks, G., Karper, E., Bisignani, D., & Brizee, A. (2013, March 10). Annotated bibliographies. Purdue OWL.

Warm-Up Activity 6.1: How to Evaluate Research Materials
This week, you are learning how to read research articles. This activity takes you to another critical step as a researcher and academic scholar: how to evaluate the merits of research materials. This includes understanding the whys behind an article, who the authors are and their expertise, and also analyzing the organizational flow and also content. Additionally, for a great overview of evaluating research materials, visit the Colorado State University’s Evaluating Resources, located under your weekly resources.

Assignment

For this assignment,

Firstly perform a search for five resources in a chosen topic area related to forensic psychology. Some example topics include eyewitness testimony, competency evaluation, psychopathy, risk assessment, treatment in correctional facilities, or the development of juvenile delinquency. You may also want to include sources that reflect the history of research on your area of interest so you can consider how this area has developed in the field of forensic psychology.

Subsequently, using the guidelines and resources you have reviewed this week, create an Annotated Bibliography focused on five sources. Provide either a copy of each article or a link to the article for your instructor as well.

Length: 5 entries – approximately 4-5 pages
Your Annotated Bibliography should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course and also by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Lastly, your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

The goal of this paper is to choose a behavior of another person that annoys, frustrates or angers you in some way. You will demonstrate how you might punish this behavior AND how you can REINFORCE the behavior that you do want.

Choose a behavior of another person that annoys frustrates or angers you in some way

The goal of this paper is to choose a behavior of another person that annoys, frustrates or angers you in some way. You will demonstrate how you might punish this behavior AND how you can REINFORCE the behavior that you do want. This exercise is to give you practice on focusing on WHAT YOU WANT and not on what you don’t want. We are only working on changing ONE behavior/operant. You have the potential to receive full credit if you address only one behavior to modify. It will be marked down if you introduce more than one behavior to modify.

a) Firstly, describe something the person often does that annoys, frustrates, or angers you.

Using positive punishment, how would you discourage this person from performing the behavior that annoys you?

b) Secondly, using negative punishment, how would you discourage this person from performing the behavior that annoys you?

c) Thirdly, which method do you tend to you and which method would you prefer to use – positive punishment or negative punishment – and why?

d) Imagine that the person’s who performed the behavior that once annoyed you, actually performs the behavior (either once or more than once) that what y‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍ou want (might be the exact opposite of annoying behavior, in any case, this behavior needs to be related to the behavior that annoyed you). Share the desired behavior.

Identification of an individual who frustrates or annoys

e) Additionally, using positive reinforcement, how would you encourage the person to do the thing that you like? Define the process of shaping, or successive approximations, and explain how these principles could be used with the positive reinforcer you have already described.

f) Using negative reinforcement, how would you encourage the person to perform the behavior that you like? g) Also, which method do you tend to use and which method would you prefer to use – positive reinforcement or negative reinforcement – and why? h) Of all four forms of operant conditioning: negative and positive reinforcement and negative and positive punishment, which one proves to be most effective in dealing with the person’s behavior that annoys you? Which of these four forms of operant conditioning might you use when dealing with future people’s behavior? i) Lastly, what are your thoughts regarding Skinner’s work? Do you agree or disagree with his concepts of operant conditioning? Are there any gaps that you see?‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍ Please explain

This is a paper that is requiring the student to focus on Freud vs Skinner on the causes and treatments of addiction. The paper also provides additional information to use in the writing of the assignment paper. Below is the assignment description:

Freud vs Skinner on the causes and treatments of addiction

Take any modern psychological issue (e.g., psychotherapy vs. medication in treatment of mental illness, social media and self-esteem) and look at it from the perspective of two theorists in this course.

The goal of this assignment is to learn about different sides of an argument from the perspectives of different theorists, and then to apply that knowledge to a pertinent topic in the present. You may write your paper as an actual debate, or simply write a traditional paper comparing and contrasting the different perspectives. The main goal is to be able to take knowledge learned in this course and to apply it to some more recent idea or issue. Remember to make your topic and your debate as specific as possible since this is only a 5-page paper.

Feel free to choose any two theorists or theories discussed in the text. Just a few examples may be:

Freud vs. Skinner on the causes and treatments of addiction

Erikson vs. Freud on social media

Skinner vs. Rogers on parenting

Horney vs. Freud on gender identity

Remember, ensure that the pages are exclusive of the cover and the reference pages. Also, ensure that you include all the references you use in finding research for this assignment paper. References should be at least three for the paper. All references, citation, and writing should follow the APA formatting and styling guidelines. Finally, ensure you focus on the assignment topic in detail.

Ensure that you follow the instructions provided keenly. Marking of the assignment is on how you do the task and how you submit the assignment too. In case of any question feel free to ask your instructor for more guidelines before doing the assignment.