Wine standards for fill containers

Write a formal, argumentative report that weighs your rule’s evidence and public comments. Your role is a think tank analyst. Prepare the best analytical argument you can for why the agency should adopt the proposal. Use the information the agency provides in the proposal, the information in the public comments, and information from other sources. You must include arguments or evidence from at least three different comments supporting the proposal. Section 1: An introduction that establishes the rule and which agency is proposing it, the think tank you are writing for, and your purpose (to persuade that agency to adopt the rule). Section 2: Describe, summarize, and analyze at least three comments supporting the proposedrule. As well as analyzing the comment itself, you’ll want to give background information on the person/organization who wrote the comment. Who are they? Why are they credible? Why might they care about the rule being implemented? The analyses for each comment always drive toward persuading your audience that the rule should be adopted and should also seek to incorporate outside evidence and the agency’s own reasons/claims/evidence. Section 3: A conclusion that summarizes the gist of your argumentation and evidence, continuing to take into consideration the regulatory agency’s mission, consumers’ concerns, and economic factors such as market failure.