Review of London’s Call of the Wild
This is an assignment that focuses on the Heiedi Kelchner’s review of London’s Call of the Wild. Raymond Benoit is another review that can be used for this assignment.
Heiedi Kelchner’s review of London’s Call of the Wild
For this essay assignment,
Choose either Heiedi Kelchner’s review of London’s Call of the Wild or Raymond Benoit’s. Then, write about whether you agree or disagree with the points made in his/her review. You will need to use specific examples from the review and back up what you are saying with examples from the book. If you agree with a point made by the reviewer, find another example in the book. If you disagree, you will need to find at least one example from the book to make your case. Option One: On your Works Cited page, there should be only two entries: One for Jack London and the other the reviewer you chose. You cannot use any other reviews.
Compare Kelchner and Benoit’s reviews. What are their similarities and/or differences? However, be sure to include your own examples from the book to make your point. Your Works Cited page must have three entries: One for London and then the two reviewers. However, do not use any other reviews. Exception: If you need to find more information about one of the philosophies or people discussed (Nietzsche, atavism, or Darwin)to use in your argument, you will need to include it on your Works Cited page.
This is the only exception for additional entries. Format: Research Paper Format. Correct margins, font size, headings are essential! USE MLA RESEARCH PAPER FORMAT FOR THE ENTIRE ANALYSIS: This includes all in text citations, all quoted and paraphrased information, and a Works Cited page. Be sure to have a title that fits in with what you are saying. Go to the sample essays in The Little Seagull or for MLA example research paper format. Remember that you can always go back to Module Five and review the films about using the MLA again. i uploaded Raymond’s view of call of the wild but was not able to get Heidi’s on there