Archive for category: Research Paper Help

This is a paper that is focusing on the research paper on the impact socioeconomic status. The paper also provides additional information to use in writing the assignment paper well.

Research paper on the impact socioeconomic status

Each student takes one culture and writes a research paper on the impact socioeconomic status has on this cultures access to care. Please include information about: health care delivery systems such as: cost effective care (health insurance), preventive care, treatment plan, health promotion and patient centered care etc.

●Choose one culture (for example: Chinese, Indian, Native American). Discuss the impact socio economic status has on their specific culture access to care. Discuss all of the things that get in the way of this cultures access to appropriate care (for example: poverty, language barriers, location) Include a discussion on healthcare delivery systems such as lack of insurance, agreement on treatment plan, or access to health promotion and resources.
In addition, discuss social determinants and health disparities within this population as well as cultural healing practices, or alternative treatments methods.

●Consider Social Determinants of Health which are conditions in your natural environment that affects an individuals or groups access to health care. Check out Unit 4 PowerPoint-(slide 8) for more information on Social Determinants. In addition, include if this culture prefers non westernized medicine. Discuss their cultural healing practices and alternative treatment methods. If this culture prefers Westernized please include this and discuss why they prefer this form of treatment. Lastly, discuss prevalent health disparities such as: chronic heart disease, asthma, birth mortality, diabetes, hypertension etc.

Research paper on the impact socioeconomic status

How do they respond to the following:

● Health promotion/research
●Cost effective care (health insurance coverage)
●Treatment
●Access to care
●Quality of care
●Preventive care/Disease prevention

Remember, ensure  that the pages are exclusive of the cover and the reference pages. Also, ensure that you include all the references you use in finding research for this assignment paper. References should be at least three for the paper. All references, citation, and writing should follow the APA formatting and styling guidelines. Finally, ensure you focus on the assignment topic in detail.

This is a paper that is focusing on the HNBS 311 Research Project on equality and diversity. The paper also provides a scenario to analyze while writing the assignment paper in detail.

HNBS 311 Research Project on equality and diversity

HNBS 311 Research Project
Learning outcomes
LO1 Firstly, examine appropriate research methodologies and approaches as part of the research process.
LO2 Secondly, conduct and analyse research relevant to a chosen business research project.
LO3 Thirdly, communicate the outcomes of a research project to identified stakeholders.
LO4 Fourthly, reflect on the application of research methodologies and concepts.

Scenario

1.1 Introduction to theme: Equality and diversity in the workplace
Equality is relevant in all workplaces, regardless of whether the business employs two people or two hundred people, irrespective of whether they work remotely, in an office, a warehouse or on a shop floor. It is about ensuring that everybody has the same access to the same opportunities without any discrimination.

Diversity takes into account differences between people and groups of people, by placing a positive value on those differences. A diverse and inclusive work place values people’s different backgrounds, knowledge, skills, and experiences, and uses these differences to create a productive and effective workforce.  Managing both equality and diversity is equally important as it impacts on all the employees working in an organisation. Business cases have proven that biases and discrimination within the workplace can impede business growth and productivity and therefore, many businesses look beyond any legal considerations and policies to effectively promote equality and diversity to improve productivity, opportunity, and competitiveness.

1.2 Topic

After discussion in class about suitable research topics, you will choose a topic of your own that relates to the theme and set a clear, well-defined research objective for this project.
Part 1: Research Proposal and Ethics Form
You are required to produce a Research Project Proposal that clearly shows what research you plan to carry out and how you will organise it.  You must use the template provided for the Project Proposal.  The Proposal should be approximately 1000 words.

Once the Research Proposal is written, you need to complete the Ethics Form using the template provided.  This will show that you have considered any possible ethical issues that may arise during your research and how you plan to deal with them.

HNBS 311 Research Project on equality and diversity

Part 2: Research Report
If your Project Proposal submitted for Part 1 was approved by the unit tutor, in this second stage of the assessment you are required to plan, organize and implement the project in line with your proposal.
You will write up the research project in a Project Report. You need to be aware that this is a relatively small-scale project and therefore you will need to be careful regarding the scale and scope of the area to be investigated.  In addition, your project report must reflect knowledge and understanding of relevant academic and professional literature.  It must be develop on the basis of appropriate research design and methods and must provide evidence of primary research and analytical skills.

The following is an indicative Structure and Content of the Project Report:

Title Page
Note: This must identify your name, ID number, unit number, the title of your research project, and other relevant information.

Contents Page
Note: The Table of Contents should be automatically generate in Word.  If relevant, you should also include a Table of Figures.

Chapter One: Introduction
1.1 Research Aim and Rationale; 1.2 Research Questions; 1.3 Research Objectives; 1.4 Significance of the Research.
Note: You will need to show that you have clearly defined your research question and have justified your choice of topic.

Research Paper – 30% of the grade. A final research paper (maximum of 5 double-spaced pages, not including the reference page) is required of each student. The research paper follows the format of a literature review. Do not waste space on a cover page or the first quarter of a page on your details. Double tap on the header at the very top of the page in Microsoft and plug in your name and the course number. Also, number your pages. Do not exceed the page limit. All references must be in APA style. The following are guidelines. Do not copy any of the language verbatim. Final Paper Guidelines (this will be utilized as a rubric for grading): Introduction: Start with the health problem. Include morbidity/mortality data. Illustrate why this health problem merits our attention. Then, state your research question and hypothesis as part of the narrative (not bullet points—make sure you transition smoothly to your RQ and hypothesis—review examples in the literature on how to do this well). “Is boarding at college associated with depression among low-income first-year college students? ” Research question example: Are Latinos at increased risk of cardiovascular disease and does this risk vary by acculturation status? Hypotheses examples: Latinos who speak mostly Spanish at home are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease compared to Latinos who speak mostly English. Latinos, overall, are overburdened with CVD risk, compared to non-Latino Whites. What would I have to write about in my introduction that would lead the reader to understand how I landed upon my RQ and hypothesis? I would look for data on CVD mortality rates and highlight disparities associated with ethnicity. I would show very clearly that heart health is a huge concern (the house is on fire) that requires immediate attention. And, this disparity in CVD risk may be explained by acculturation. Be very specific about how you operationalize your variables: here, the social determinant is acculturation. The health outcome is CVD. The population of interest is all Latinos as an ethnic group. Latino is not a racial category, so I will be clear about that language in my writing. I may address other confounders that impact this relationship, like education, marital status, and health insurance. Methods: How will I go about searching for articles related to my research question and hypothesis? Refer to the sample articles for how to word this section. Simplified example: The search will be conducted utilizing Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus. The search terms are: Latino, cardiovascular, and acculturation. The search will be limited to articles in peer reviewed journals published between 2009 and 2019. The inclusion criterium is all studies that measure acculturation utilizing language spoken at home. Results: Literally, report the results of your search. Simplified example: Based on the search terms, Pubmed returned 48 articles, Embase 223, and Scopus 3. Utilizing the inclusion criteria, the final list of articles was reduced to 5. Some people love to include a flow chart here. If you do it well, it’s a nice addition to a systematic review. Discussion: This is where you write your narrative—weave the findings from the authors’ studies into your own authentic scientific health research with the goal of answering your research question. Spare the details on the methods the authors utilized, unless you are focusing on interventions aimed at eliminating a health disparity. I believe only one person is going in this direction. Then, you will include information on sampling because you have to talk about transportability. Is the study’s findings externally valid—can it be transposed to the community you want to work with? You will know if you are focusing on interventions because you received commentary to that effect from me. Otherwise, steer clear of spending large amounts of space writing about the sampling, data collection, locations, survey types, etc. Read your articles thoroughly and practice interpreting the findings. Then, weave the interpretations (with citations) into how you plan to answer your research question and support or refute your hypothesis. For many of you, I’ve written examples in the critique you received on the midterm. If you get stuck, turn to the literature. You have at your disposal countless free examples of how to do this by industry experts. In this space, you can also plug in charts and graphs that are reported in the literature that may support your RQ/hypothesis. You have to cite every iota of data that you pull from a source. Conclusion: Restate your research question and tell me where you landed after conducting the search. Were you able to successfully answer the question? Make sure the articles you find after eliminating everything that doesn’t fit are ideal in terms of providing evidence that you need to answer your RQ. Do they actually report data and facts? If you mostly find qualitative data, you have to synthesize the themes that the authors report and you should then tweak your search terms to include statistical analysis of associations (correlations, risk ratios, odds ratios, etc), so that you have a good combination of evidence. For this assignment, it will not be sufficient to state, “there is not enough written on the topic”. You will have to pick a different topic in that case. Here, you are also going to discuss limitations. What did an author miss in his/her/their reporting? What did they do wrong that might have impacted their results? For those of you thinking of moving on to Masters programs, this is the crux of what you will be asked to do when looking at other authors’ investigations. Finally, conclude with directions for further research. What are the gaps that your literature review highlighted? Where do we need to focus our efforts? What was missing? Additional guidelines: Make sure your reference page is in APA format. Do not write long quotes from the articles. Every sentence should be in your own words, but include data or findings from the articles (where applicable) and cite the appropriate reference. Do not cite a reference by putting a website in parenthesis. For the purpose of this paper, only peer reviewed journal articles should be referenced. That is what you are setting out to do when you access these databases. Make sure you click on peer reviewed journal articles, when given that option. You will be penalized for circular sentences, awkward sentence structure, run-on sentences, and other grammar and punctuation errors.

Research: The Power of Language and Labels: ‘The Mentally Ill’ Versus ‘People With Mental Illnesses’. Your response must be typed, doubled spaced in 12 font size on 4 – 7 pages (including main text only) with margins set to 1 inch. Your analysis paper needs to adhere to the APA style guidelines. Your completed analysis paper should include: (1) a title page, (2) a summary (or abstract) of your critique (a maximum of 250 words, the abstract should be a single paragraph that follows the title page, written on a separate page), (3) main text, and (4) references (on a separate page). You can refer to the APA format template to write your paper (the yellow highlights include the explanation of APA format, you need to remove the yellow highlights and add your own words. Please also replace the Headings to headings that pertains to your paper, such as Research Problem and Research Questions. You may only need two levels of headings for your paper). Note. Do not write this paper in a question and answer format. Headings can be used in the critique to improve readability (See p. 62 or 3.03 Levels of Heading of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association). Questions to address in the quantitative analysis paper Your analysis paper should address all the following questions: a. What is (are) the research problem(s) addressed in the study? b. What is (are) the importance of the research problem (s)? c. What is (are) the purpose statement(s)? d. What is (are) the research question(s)? e. Choose one of the research questions and identify the independent variable and the dependent variable (including control variables, moderating variables, and intervening variables, if applicable) in the research question. f. How well does the literature review lead to the research questions? g. Describe the sampling procedure in the study. Is (are) the author(s) of the article aware of any problems in this procedure? How are the problems addressed? h. Describe reliability and validity evidences of the instruments. i. Are there any considerations that arose in the data collection and processing (e.g., missing data, suspected cheating, standard administration of instruments was not followed)? j. Describe the analysis procedures, including what statistical analyses were conducted (e.g., regression analyses, analyses of covariance, independent-samples t tests). Does (do) the author(s) provide justification of the appropriateness of the statistical tests? k. What is (are) the major finding(s)? l. What conclusion(s) is (are) drawn? Are the conclusions supported by the data? Does (do) the author(s) answer all the research questions? m. If you were the researcher, how would you improve the study? Be specific. Example (a) — If I were the researcher in this study, I would describe the reason to include three different samples in the study. One possible reason is that the literature has suggested different results from these three samples. Example (b) — If I were the researcher in this study, I would collect additional qualitative data. Information obtained by the qualitative data enhances our understanding of the mechanisms behind the positive relationships between the number of high school counselors and the 4-year college-going rates. Example (c) — If I were the researcher in this study, I would use a different instrument to measure the outcome. The reliability of the instrument is too low. Researchers may not be able to replicate the study by using the same instrument. LINK :https://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=e9169069-9969-44ce-950b-5b763460ab54%40pdc-v-sessmgr02&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=112043638&db=ccm