Archive for category: Research Paper Help

6 qualities of a good research paper

In this post, we will be trying to answer the question: what makes a good research paper/ argumentative essay? So, these key qualities of a good research paper include:

A Position/ Thesis Statement

Before you start writing your research paper, it’s always prudent to come up with a statement that puts everything you will be talking about in the whole document. In this case, the position/ thesis statement acts as the central pillar which the entire essay is built upon. In this case, you need to develop a precise and a well-crafted thesis statement.

It’s prudent to note that a thesis statement is usually an arguable opinion/ position based on a deep dive, which means you should not cite it. So, you only cite statements that you write to defend it.

Well-developed Topic Sentences

The topic sentences are the first sentences in each paragraph. These sentences are basically points that directly defend the thesis statement. Unlike the thesis statement, the topic sentences are not opinions; they are facts/ research study conclusions based on credible academic sources.

To be able to raise a strong argument, you need to arrange your points (which are developed into topic sentences) from the sharpest points to the weakest points.

You should also note that raising a few topic sentences with in-depth and detailed research is better than many topic sentences to develop. So, when developing a topic sentence, don’t think of how many points you will raise but focus on a few strong points and how you will develop them diligently. The topic sentences are used in developing the body paragraphs of the research paper.

Application of relevant statics data

They say you cannot argue with numbers. Accurate statistics in paragraph development are instrumental in authenticating an argument. In this regard, it’s prudent to use statistical information in developing the topic sentences.

Additionally, graphs can be instrumental in achieving the clarity of a research paper.

Counterargument paragraph for argumentative essays

In argumentative essays, the counterargument paragraph comes just before the conclusion paragraph. In this paragraph, you raise a point from the opposing side at the beginning. Consequently, In further development, you will need to show that indeed the issue at hand in this paragraph is not sufficient to discredit/ change your original viewpoint

Other aspects

• Paragraph development.

It’s prudent to develop a balanced paragraph in terms of word count. In particular, a professional research paper paragraph should have between 100- 130 words.

Also, note that transition words are vital aspects that help in achieving the flow of ideas.

• Use of Authentic Academic Sources

Authentic academic sources include books and peer-reviewed journal articles not more than five years old. Common journal article databases include EBSCOhost, Proquest, and Google Scholar.

Simplified Research Paper Outline

• Introduction

Introduce the topic and a build-up for thesis formulation

The thesis statement appears as the last statement of the introduction paragraph

• Body Paragraph 1,2, 3,4…

Topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph

Build paragraphs by developing the topic sentences

• Counterargument paragraph

Topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph to present opposing views.

Explain the contradicting views

Provide evidences with an aim of neutralizing this view/ position

• Conclusion

Restate the thesis statement (You should write it in different words from what you gave in the introduction paragraph)

Offer closing remarks

Click here for further assistance in Research/ Argumentative Writing

Quantitative Research Proposal

Instructions from my professor: Quantitative Research Proposal Please complete the research proposal of your topic, (“Using pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to reduce the risk of HIV.”) based on the methodology you selected in week 4, (Quantitative Methodology Analysis was attached with name WS 04 PrEP). The research proposal should include the following sections: 1) Introduction, 2) literature review, 3) Methodology, which includes proposed: research design, data collection, and data analysis.

You are to choose one industry for your analysis. Your report can include any information you deem relevant but should focus on the effects on the industry from the pandemic and also from subsequent government action.

You are to choose one industry for your analysis

This is major research paper and the scenario which is the guide to your assignment.  Read it carefully and follow it closely.  Most elements are contained in the scenario.

Here are some additional instructions:
1.      You are to choose one industry for your analysis.

2.      Your report can include any information you deem relevant but should focus on the effects on the industry from the pandemic and also from subsequent government action.

3.      You must use the tools such as supply and demand, marginal analysis and cost and benefits to analyze decisions made by households and businesses that has been developed throughout the class ECO 202 but be selective—only use the ones that are relevant to your analysis.

4.      Analysis is the most important part of this assignment. This is what your assessment will be based on.
Good writing structure—especially subheadings—and proper citation methodology are MANDATORY.  THE SCENARIO
You are an economist employed as an industry analyst for NOVA Securities, L.L.P., an investment firm structured as a partnership.

Your job is to analyze one specific industry and write a report which then can be used by the firm’s Executive Committee to decide where to steer clients’ investments. The job is not to try to win the partners on the Executive Committee over to your industry or to market it in any way. Your function is to provide objective, detailed, and accurate analysis covering the critical factors that are relevant to an appraisal of the industry. The Partners expect pertinent information apprising them of where the industry was (snapshot, pre-pandemic), where it is (the heart of the analysis), and where it’s going (informed predictions) .

The Partnership is small relative to giants like Goldman Sachs or Morgan Stanley. The firm’s resources can’t support original quantitative and qualitative positive analysis.

Therefore, you are to rely on the comprehensive research of others;

As long as it’s precise, objective, and reliable work, conducted by highly regarded analysts at reputable institutions. The Partners have confidence in organizations such as universities, non-profit think tanks, business-analysis consultancies, trade associations, the Federal Reserve Bank, government research agencies such as those that reside in the Commerce and Treasury Departments, non-partisan Congressional bodies like the Congressional Research Service (CRS) and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), etc.

You are to rely on these kinds of resources:

Firstly, reports

Secondly, papers

Thirdly, published articles

Fourthly, research summaries from websites

Further, analytical blogs, podcasts

Also, interviews with industry executives

Further, government data

Furthermore, any other outlets for solid

Also, relevant information.

Finally, you are aware that analysts have been dismiss ed for relying on popular media and shortcut websites like Economics Help, and close cousins.

The Partners have no patience for long-wind reports that are bloat ed with extraneous, off- topic information. They expect reports that are concise, disciplin, and focus. They also have no tolerance for writing which is sloppy, illogical in structure, and hard to follow. In addition, as they read reports, they want to know where your information came from. Most partners went to elite colleges and universities where proper citation methodology was mandatory with stringent penalties for violations.

 

This paper is on Questions That Guide Inquiry: Research vs. Practice Change Project. This week, you will discuss the differences between the questions that drive research and those that drive the search for evidence to support a QI project.

Questions That Guide Inquiry Research vs Practice Change Project

This week, you will discuss the differences between the questions that drive research and those that drive the search for evidence to support a QI project. In this assignment, you will identify the components of each type of question and also identify the differences between them.

Using the South University Online Library, the Internet, and your text readings, respond to the following question in a minimum of 300–500 words:

Firstly, how can you differentiate a research question from a question that will guide the literature search to look for evidence?

Secondly, consider the elements required for a quantitative research design consistent with the scientific method and those for a PICOT question that will guide the search for research studies to guide practice change.
Provide reasons and evidence in support of your responses.

More details;

Types of Clinical Question

Family relationships and effect on child’s growth and development

This paper is about Family relationships and how it affects a childs well being. To begin your paper, follow the following advice: “To give your writing the most important thing of all—namely, …

Family relationships and how it affects a childs well being

To begin your paper, follow the following advice: “To give your writing the most important thing of all—namely, a point—a writer needs to indicate clearly not only what his or her thesis is, but also what larger conversation that thesis is responding to”. In this case, the conversation you’re responding to is the one surrounding your issue. Further, indicate at the beginning of your paper that you’re writing in response to that conversation; then state a thesis that consists of your claim and also supporting reasons.

More details;

The purpose of this chapter is to present the analysis of a number of family-based factors that can influence child well-being. We are presently witnessing a worsening position for children, of different degrees and intensities, in various parts of the world. This is a consequence not only of the financial crisis currently ravaging many Western nations, it is also a result of the deterioration of the economic and social conditions of young parents with low education and of their children in the last decades.

Although there is evidence of welfare state regimes having a positive impact on the outcomes for children in terms of enhanced social cohesion and reduction of poverty as a result of resource redistribution, it is not clear yet what aspects of material conditions really matter for achieving other dimensions of well-being. Family policies should also be based on a child-centered perspective. Lastly, one way this can be done is through mainstreaming standard evaluation of policy outcomes in terms of child well-being.