Archive for category: Homework Assignment Help

This is a paper that is focusing on the determining your own personal leadership style. The paper also provides additional information to use in writing the assignment paper.

Determining your own personal leadership style assignment

For this assignment, you are asked to determine your own personal leadership style. Start by taking the self-assessment from the MindTools website: (https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/leadership-style-quiz.htm). Next, complete the required Goleman reading. Develop an understanding of your leadership style.

Goleman, D. (2000, March-April). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://www.enterprisingminds.ca/download/leadership_that_gets_results.pdf

Determining your own personal leadership style assignment

Based on your experiences, current readings, work experience, education, and use of self-assessment instruments, describe what you think your personal leadership styles are. Include the following in your response:

Develop an understanding of your leadership style(s).
What is/are your style(s) and give an example of when you have applied your leadership style(s)?
In what ways will this/these style(s) help you achieve your goals?
Evaluate yourself relative to emotional intelligence (Goleman article) and explain how you will expand your emotional intelligence.
What areas of leadership styles may be shortcomings and how will you improve your leadership?

Remember, ensure  that the paper is at least three pages exclusive of the cover and the reference pages. Also, ensure that you include all the references you use in finding research for this assignment paper. References should be at least three for the paper. All references, citation, and writing should follow the APA formatting and styling guidelines. Finally, ensure you focus on the assignment topic in detail.

Ensure that you follow the instructions provided keenly. Marking of the assignment is on how you do the task and how you submit the assignment too. In case of any question feel free to ask your instructor for more guidelines before doing the assignment.

This is a paper that is focusing on the review the concepts related to dying and bereavement. The paper also provides additional information to use in writing the assignment paper.

Review the concepts related to dying and bereavement

Instructions

Review the concepts related to dying and bereavement across the life span, the four-component model, and Kübler-Ross’s five stages of dying. Identify the key differences in dying and the bereavement process across the life span. Apply the four-component model to the grieving process at one of the life stages you identified in the first paragraph.

Use your imagination or apply your personal experience to describe the grieving process for your chosen life stage in terms of the following: The context of the loss; refer to risk factors, such as whether the death was expected. Continuation of subjective meaning associated with loss, ranging from evaluations of everyday concerns to major questions about the meaning of life. Changing representations of the lost relationship over time. The role of coping and emotion regulation processes that cover all coping strategies used to deal with grief.

Review the concepts related to dying and bereavement

Describe Elisabeth Kübler-Ross’s five stages of dying and provide examples that illustrate each stage. To complete the assignment address each of the following elements in a 3-4 page paper: Identify the key differences in dying and the bereavement process across the life span. Apply the four-component model to the grieving process at one of the life stages you identified in the first paragraph. Use your imagination or apply your personal experience to describe the grieving process for your chosen life stage in terms of the following: The context of the loss; refer to risk factors, such as whether the death was expected.

Continuation of subjective meaning associated with loss, ranging from evaluations of everyday concerns to major questions about the meaning of life. Changing representations of the lost relationship over time. The role of coping and also emotion regulation processes that cover all coping strategies used to deal with grief. Describe Elisabeth Kübler-Ross’s five stages of dying and provide examples that illustrate each stage.

This paper is on Increased stress in Aviation Maintenance Technicians should not be ignored, consequently it will contribute to a lack of confidence in mid-level management and the decision making process.

Increased stress in Aviation Maintenance Technicians should not be ignored consequently it will contribute to a lack of confidence in mid-level management and the decision making process

Final Project English Composition

________________________________________
OVERVIEW
The final project provides you with an opportunity to demonstrate various written skills learned throughout the course using a variety of communication modalities. The final project consists of the following two-parts:

•             Argumentative Research Paper
•             PowerPoint Presentation (with voiceover from myself)

________________________________________
INSTRUCTIONS
Part 1: Argumentative Research Paper

Identify a problem that is occurring in your state or profession/industry. Make sure your reader knows where the issue is located. For instance, if you are writing about an industry, identify the industry. What is your connection to the problem? How does it impact your state or profession/industry, and who does it tend to impact the most?

Thesis Statement: Increased stress in Aviation Maintenance Technicians should not be ignored, consequently it will contribute to a lack of confidence in mid-level management and the decision making process.

Follow the instructions below.

1.            Write a 3-page (750 to 825 words), double-spaced, argumentative research paper supporting your solution or argument. Keep in mind, your goal as a writer is to defend your claim through scholarly research and convince your reader that your solution or argument is a logical and supported one.

2.            Pick the solution or argument that you consider to be the best one from the research that you’ve done.

3.            Include at least five scholarly sources and proper in-text citations in APA or MLA format.

4.            Your paper must include a Works Cited or References page and acknowledge all sources that you summarize, paraphrase, and/or quote within the paper.

Guidelines

Your argumentative research paper should include a cover page if you are using APA and proper headers if you are using MLA. The paper must include a minimum of five scholarly sources such as eBooks, books, journals, or webpages that end in .edu, .org, or .gov.

As you prepare this paper, ask yourself the following questions:

Firstly, have I established the context and purpose of my paper?

Secondly, have I clearly stated my thesis and established the central theme?

Thirdly, have I defined the scope of my thesis and determined key concepts?

Fourthly, have I selected information sources that relate to these concepts?

Further, have I used a variety of search strategies and appropriate information sources to access information?

Additionally, have I chosen sources based on multiple criteria such as relevance to the research question, currency, and authority?

Also, Is my content appropriate and relevant?

Besides, have I made reference to readings as appropriate?

Moreover, have I communicated, organized, and synthesized information as appropriate?

Furthermore, Is my paper organized logically? Does my writing display focus and structure?

Finally, have I correctly applied information use strategies concerning citations/references; choices among paraphrasing, summary, or quoting; use of information in the proper context; and choices about whether ideas are common knowledge or require attribution?

Have I considered the ethical and legal restrictions on the use of published, confidential, and proprietary information?

Have I fulfilled the length requirement for the writing assignment and sufficiently addressed assignment criteria?

Finally, have I properly documented sources of information?

Part 2: PowerPoint Presentation
Showing that you know and understand counterarguments to your position on a topic strengthens your argument in the eyes of your reader. It demonstrates that you have done your homework and considered all sides of an issue before establishing a position and offering a solution.

Guidelines

Imagine that you have been asked to present your argument at a conference on your paper’s chosen topic. Then, imagine a few scholars in the field who disagree with your claim are present in the audience. Additionally, during a question and answer session during the conference, consider two scholars countering your paper’s position. Let your readers know what their arguments are and work to convince the audience that your position is the stronger one or that your solution is the better one. Both sides will have merit, but help your audience understand why your claim is the more logical and reasonable one.

1.            Create a PowerPoint presentation with voiceover containing at least 6 slides that uses words, images, and narration.

2.            Develop two of the strongest scholarly counterarguments against your paper’s claim (2 slides for each argument).

3.            Convince the audience that their claims are weak, based on the research you conducted (2 slides). Do not demean the opposition, call them names, or directly attack their positions. If your argument is truly the stronger one, it should stand up against fairly presented academic research.

You will record yourself orally giving the presentation while displaying the PowerPoint slides.
________________________________________

Note: This assignment corresponds to or addresses the following Undergraduate Institutional Learning Outcomes on Written Communication and Information Literacy:

•             Students communicate their ideas effectively in writing using text, data, and images as appropriate and in different genres and styles.

•             Students identify, locate, evaluate, and effectively and responsibly use and share information for the problem at hand.

Written Communication

•             Establish the context and purpose of the writing assignment or paper; the thesis is identified and central theme is indicated. (Purpose for writing)

•             Use appropriate and relevant content that demonstrates sufficient command of the subject; provides a germane analysis of ideas; and includes references to readings wherever necessary. (Content development)

•             Logically organize material into well-formed paragraphs; writing has focus and structure. (Organization)

•             Fulfill the length requirement for the writing assignment and sufficiently address assignment criteria and explore concepts. (Expectations/completeness)

•             Support points and subpoints with sufficient detail, attribute sources as necessary, and link ideas; evidence relates to the purpose/thesis of the writing assignment or paper. (Evidence)

•             Properly document sources of information with in-text citations linking to Works Cited or References at the end of the paper; format may include a few minor errors. (Sources and documentation)

•             Write in complete sentences with mostly correct grammar, word choice, punctuation, and spelling; minor errors may exist but do not compromise meaning. (Mechanics)

Information Literacy
•             Define the scope of the research question or thesis and determine key concepts; types of information (sources) selected relate to concepts or answers the research question. (Determining extent of information needed)

•             Access information using a variety of search strategies and appropriate information sources. (Accessing needed information)

•             Choose a variety of information sources appropriate to the scope and discipline of the research question, after considering the importance of multiple criteria such as relevance to the research question, currency, and authority. (Evaluating information and its sources critically)

•             Communicate, organize, and synthesize information and achieve intended purpose. (Using information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose)

•             Correctly apply three of the following information use strategies:

(1) citations and references; (2) choice of paraphrasing, summary, or quoting; (3) using information in ways that are true to the original context; and (4) distinguishing between common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution. Demonstrate in the process a sound understanding of the ethical and legal restrictions on the use of published, confidential, and proprietary information. (Accessing and using information ethically and legally)

________________________________________
WRITING AND RESEARCH RESOURCES
The following links provide online writing and research aids to help you with your paper assignments.

OWL (Online Writing Lab) at Purdue University
Writer’s Handbook, the Writing Center at the University of Wisconsin–Madison
Finally, APA Guidelines

This is a paper that is focusing on the complete an essay on desired outcomes for family discipleship. The paper also provides additional steps to use in writing the assignment paper clearly.

Complete an essay on desired outcomes for family discipleship

You will complete an essay on desired outcomes for family discipleship. Your essay will be comprised of three sections in addition to an introduction and summary/conclusion.  The first section should introduce the reader to at least 3–5 specific desired outcomes from a Family Discipleship Strategy that impacts “Knowing” (Cognition).  The second section should introduce the reader to at least 3–5 specific desired outcomes from a Family Discipleship Strategy that impacts “Doing” (Psychomotor/Skills).  The third section should introduce the reader to at least 3–5 specific desired outcomes from a Family Discipleship Strategy that impacts “Being” (Affective/Beliefs). Each outcome should be followed with a brief paragraph that explains why this outcome is significant for a disciple.  You may wish to utilize Bloom’s Taxonomy which provides a helpful list of verbs that may help you in writing your outcomes. You may simply google “Bloom’s Taxonomy” for additional information.

The following are important questions to consider when planning your outcomes:
How can parent holistically educate and train their children in developing the identified outcomes?
What is the Biblical support for the outcomes you have selected?
What aspects of family discipleship are out of the control of the parent?
How do parents prepare children for life challenges and temptations?
How is family discipleship contextualized based on the age of the child?

Outcomes must begin with, “My child will be able to [insert action verb from Bloom’s taxonomy]…” When creating these outcomes, consider the affective, cognitive, and behavioral aspects of training and teaching. All are important.

At least 3 course textbooks/material or peer-review sources.
This essay must be 4–5 pages (12-point font, Times New Roman, double space, and 1-inch margins) and must not be written in first person.  The paper should have a title page, table of contents and bibliography.

In the Citigroup litigation, shareholders alleged that directors breached their fiduciary duty by allowing the business divisions to remain active in the subprime mortgage market long after other competitors, such as JP Morgan,

In the Citigroup litigation shareholders alleged that directors

Fiduciary Duties as a Mechanism

1. In the Citigroup litigation, shareholders alleged that directors breached their fiduciary duty by allowing the business divisions to remain active in the subprime mortgage market long after other competitors, such as JP Morgan, began to reduce their exposure to these types of loans and the exotic financial products that financial product engineers developed using these risky loans. In your initial post for this Discussion Question:

Imagine that you served as Citigroup’s chief risk officer during the period at issue in the litigation.

The lawyers for the plaintiffs (shareholders) have asked you to testify regarding the decision to continue to allow the credit department to issue subprime mortgages to borrowers likely to default on home mortgage loans, to acquire portfolios of subprime mortgages, and to create financial products comprised of subprime mortgages.

How might you go about explaining your decisions?

Were there legitimate business reasons to have remained in this market?

Were there particular challenges you faced in designing a compliance policy to assess the risks that financial investments might decline in value in the future?

In your follow‐up postings for this Discussion Question, provide your own evaluation of the arguments presented. Were you persuade by the arguments raise on behalf of Citigroup’s chief risk officer?

Or do you agree with the shareholders that the board of directors and risk management professionals should have anticipated the sudden calamitous decline in the value of subprime mortgages and related financial products in 2007?

2. Imagine that you are the chief compliance officer for an international stock brokerage firm.

You are asked to meet with the board of directors of the firm to provide suggestions that will enable the firm to ensure that employees comply with the firm’s compliance programs.

Firstly, how will the standard articulated by the courts in Caremark and Citigroup inform your recommendations?

Secondly, does this standard require the board of directors or the chief compliance officer to be aware of every violation of the firm’s compliance policies?

Thirdly, how diligently should the board of directors and executives police employee activities?

Further, should shareholders expect the board and compliance professionals to identify wrongdoing that happens:

a) rarely;

b) periodically, or

c) frequently?

Additionally, should it matter if the actors frequently accused of wrongdoing are rank‐in‐file employees or executives?

Finally, what specific policies will you recommend to help ferret out wrongdoing by employees who work in the firm’s ten offices located around the world?