Using Nazi research

1. Background explanation of the ethical issue. a. Clearly articulated and insightful with a sense of purpose. (3 points) Be sure to include a summary of the arguments for and against. b. The presentation of the ethical issue may be strongly articulated, insightful, or purposeful, but fails to be all three. (2 points) c. Focuses more on substantive health issue not the ethical issue. (1 point) d. Hard to tell what the ethical issue is. (0 points) 2. Reference, cite and explain the current legal status of the topic (cases, statutes, and/or proposed statutes, etc. a. Legal reference is relevant for the ethical issue, timely, and explained clearly. (3 points) b. Legal reference is relevant for the ethical issue, timely, and/or explained clearly, but fails to do all three. (2 points) c. Reference is not particularly appropriate for the ethical issue. (1 point) d. No legal reference is cited. (0 points) 3. Reference and discuss two author’s opposing (i.e.one for and one against) perspectives of the ethical issues raised by the topic. a. The two authors’ opposing perspectives were relevant, balanced and discussed in an insightful manner. (3 points) b. The two authors’ opposing perspectives were relevant, balanced and/or discussed in an insightful manner, but not all three. (2 points) c. Only one relevant author and/or ethical perspective was referenced. (1 point) d. No authors’ ethical perspectives were referenced. (0 points) 4. Argue two opposing (i.e.one for and one against) ethical perspectives of the issue utilizing at least two of the ethical theories and principles cited in the course text. a. The two ethical theories or principles were relevant, balanced and discussed in an insightful manner. (3 points) b. The two ethical theories or principles were relevant, balanced and/or discussed in an insightful manner, but not all three. (2 points) c. Only one relevant ethical theory or principle was referenced. (1 point) d. No relevant ethical theories or principles were referenced. (0 points) 5. Conclusion a. The conclusion weighs the two approaches taken in the paper and then uses reasoning to assess which approach makes the most sense. (8 points) b. The conclusion is reasonable and supported within the paper; however, it is not made clear why other perspectives were discounted. (5 points) c. The conclusion seems to be weighted heavily from an opinionated as opposed to a researched point of view. (2 points) d. There is no conclusion. (0 points) 6. a. The paper is five to seven single spaced pages. (2.5 points) b. A bibliography with a minimum of five references is included (2.5 points)