Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) – Pamphlet 

/0 Comments/in , /by

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) – Pamphlet 

*TEACHING PAMPHLET: in pamphlet format, This pamphlet is to teach or provide information of
whatever pediatric-related topic has been chosen. ( SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME) It
can be of instructional, informative, or safety in nature. Think of your completed product as a
brochure of something that you might see in the Pediatrician’s office on a subject matter that may
interest someone with a child. Put your thinking caps on, be creative!

The evolutionary biology of infectious disease

/0 Comments/in , /by

The evolutionary biology of infectious disease

Turn in a complete photocopy of all sources with references along with the paper.
12 point font. Double-spaced. Literature cited. 5 sources, using only ONE online source.
Content: Appropriate topic and specific correct information
Clarity: Include details and specific explanations.
Literature Cited: Sufficient and diverse sources with proper credit given – cited within text and in
a final “Literature Cited” section of paper. No plagiarizing. Turn in a complete photocopy of all
sources with references along with your paper.
Overall: Smooth flow and clarity of ideas. Follow a scientific style of writing.
Turn-in: The paper AND a brief outline of your presentation including main points and sources.
Neatness & Mechanics: Sentence structure, grammar, and spelling should be at least nearperfect.

Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease

/0 Comments/in , /by

Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease

CJD Infectious/causative agent CJD Pathophysiology (mechanism) * the whole process

CJD Molecular anatomy

CJD Diagnosis

CJD pathophysiology and mechanism: What are prions?

How prions can cause cjd the pathway?

What exactly happens to the brain In the familial cjd what genes are involved?

how people get the disease and what gets affected in the body.

It should include at least 10 pieces of primary literature related to CJD, with an emphasis on recent developments in the field (from after 2008) *** Do not put review article as source because it does not count. **** And please please please site everything even if you proceed the 15 sources

Health Equity

/0 Comments/in , /by

Health Equity

1. Using a workplace example* discuss the importance of quality improvement in relation to patient safety and improving health outcomes.

2. Summarize the system level QI initiatives described in Hyzy et al. (2012)Preview the document that might be applicable to your workplace.

3. And finally describe how you might apply the seven step QI process Spear teaches in the following video — problem, examination, diagnosis, plan, implementation, follow-up, repeat —

Resources: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=8&v=Kmh_hVwGo-Q&feature=emb_logo

Nursing: Law and Ethics

/0 Comments/in /by

Nursing: Law and Ethics

Analysis of Law Manuscript Write a scholarly manuscript in APA format as follows:

Choose a health care delivery issue from your readings related to nurses in advanced roles.

For example, what is the relationship between

• nurses in advanced roles and delegation to unlicensed assistive personnel; or,

• nurses in advanced roles and emergency psychiatric admissions; or,

• nurses in advanced roles and the emergency medical treatment and labor act (EMTALA); or,

• nurses in advanced roles and assisted suicide; or,

• nurses in advanced roles and violence in the workplace.

Find specific regulatory or statutory language that currently defines your chosen issue (i.e., find the exact phrase in either the federal or state regulation or law that is used to legislate how this issue is currently enforced).

Reflect on how this language should be tweaked to better meet the clients, students, or organizations you serve.

Conduct a thorough search and retrieve evidence from valid, reliable, and credible legal, health policy literature and legislative websites that support your tweaked language.

Provide a scholarly analysis of your legal issue and how it should be changed to better reflect current policy and practice. Follow this format.

Title page

Abstract page

Introduction and background

• identified issue/ problem

• gap in existing statutory language related to that issue

• purpose of this paper to address that gap in the statutory language

Current law and proposed statutory change

Literature review

Stakeholders, Triggers and Barriers Plan for change, implications and recommendations for practice

Conclusion

References

Appendices

Your manuscript should be no more than 15 pages (excluding appendices); remember, this document is 30% of your total grade and it is expected that it is of publishable quality.

Therefore, it is suggested that you utilize an editor prior to submission to your instructor for grading should you require assistance with spelling, punctuation, grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, or APA formatting.

Review the grading rubric for this assignment prior to submitting your paper for a grade.

It can be found under the course documents.

Kangaroo Care Nursing

/0 Comments/in /by

Kangaroo Care Nursing

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue
they have identified for their capstone change proposal project, the literature review enables
students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.
A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what
is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the
earlier PICOT Statement Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-
1,000 word review that includes the following sections:
Title page
Introduction section
A comparison of research questions
A comparison of sample populations
A comparison of the limitations of the study
A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to
become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the
Student Success Center.

Mental Health Theories

/0 Comments/in , /by

Mental Health Theories

CRITERIA
-APA: Title Page, Grammar, punctuation & intext citations present & correct.
-MUST Choose 2 theorists from Essentials of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing text by Elizabeth
Varicolis (Chapter 3).
-Describe and list major ideas presented.
-History of the Person who developed the theories
-Compare and contrast similarities and differences
-Describe how each theory could be used in a specific patient example
-Conclude with your own thoughts on the theories.
-Body of paper is 3 pages

 

Nurses’ Cultural Background and impact on Care

/0 Comments/in , /by

Nurses’ Cultural Background and impact on Care

This week, you will consider your own diverse cultural and generational background and how it
impacts the care you provide to your patients.
For this written assessment we will focus on generational diversity in the nursing population.
Click here to download table 12.2. on p. 379 of your textbook. Review and address the following:
Define and describe the four generations – name, timeframe, and a description of that group’s
characteristics.
Choose the group to which you belong (i was born in 1983). Explain how you think that you fit
with this assessment of that generation (Millennials and Generation X).

Select any other group to which you do not belong (Baby Boomer and the veterans). Explain how
those from your group can learn from that group, and explain how that group could learn from
yours.
References
Minimum of four (4) total references: two (2) references from required course materials and two
(2) peer-reviewed references. All references must be no older than five years (unless making a
specific point using a seminal piece of information)
Peer-reviewed references include references from professional data bases such as PubMed or
CINHAL applicable to population and practice area, along with evidence based clinical practice
guidelines. Examples of unacceptable references are Wikipedia, UpToDate, Epocrates,
Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical
databases

Nursing Advocacy and its Role in Cultural Diversity

/0 Comments/in , /by

Nursing Advocacy and its Role in Cultural Diversity

Examine how to be a patient advocate for all individuals, particularly those who are from a
different culture than your own.
First, consider an ethical dilemma that you have encountered in your own nursing practice—
choose one that was caused by a misunderstanding between people from different cultures.
Describe that situation clearly.

How did each group or individual perceive the dilemma? (Present both sides, objectively.)
Identify the conflicting values and belief systems held by each group.
What data was missing—what information did the health care providers not have about the
patient’s culture?
Next, define culturally congruent care.
References
Minimum of four (4) total references: two (2) references from required course materials and two
(2) peer-reviewed references. All references must be no older than five years (unless making a
specific point using a seminal piece of information)
Peer-reviewed references include references from professional data bases such as PubMed or
CINHAL applicable to population and practice area, along with evidence based clinical practice
guidelines. Examples of unacceptable references are Wikipedia, UpToDate, Epocrates,
Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical
databases.

Outdoor physical activity improved mental health status of adults with clinical depression

/0 Comments/in , /by

Outdoor physical activity improved mental health status of adults with clinical depression

First page essay instruction:
During this semester, you have spent a significant amount of time developing, refining, and narrowing a research
question. According to Comer (pp. 91-94), effective research questions:
• Originate from a disciplinary context (take into account prior disciplinary knowledge)
• Maintain significance (to a subset of people)
• Keep a pointed scope (they are manageable and part of a larger question)
• Spur further research (they have multiple branches of inquiry leading to and from them)
Describe how your most current research question (as stated in the literature review) fulfills each of the
characteristics described above. How does your research question fit within a specific discourse community? How
is it significant for a specific audience, but also manageable enough to be addressed within the constraints of the
proposal? How might your question spur additional questions? What other avenues of research were left
unexplored but might be viable research questions for your area of inquiry? Provide specific examples of how your
research question meets/does not meet the characteristics above.
As you write the advocacy letter, how is that new audience engaged (the caregiver of Care Old People Home) with
your research question? How does that audience contribute, make a decision, or influence what happens next to
the research question and to the arguments you made in the literature review?
Second page : Aim for 350 words.
In this forum, you will focus on your literature review and advocacy letter as you answer the questions
below. Please include specific examples from your own work.
1. In a sentence or two, describe the key argument(s) and audience(s) of your literature review and
of your advocacy letter.
2. Describe how your research question changed over time (you may refer to the online activities
that directly addressed narrowing the research question). Specifically, if you were re-doing the
“Articulating the research question” activity, how would it be different? Why did it change? How
did it change? What decisions did you make as you developed a narrow focus? Be specific and
use concrete examples.
3. Briefly describe 2-3 tasks you completed as you used some of the research you found while
writing the literature review to write the advocacy letter. What steps did you take to shift the
emphasis towards a new audience and while using a different genre? What has worked well?
What has been a challenge? How have you addressed this challenge?
4. What skills learned as you gathered sources, narrowed the focus of the project, and synthesized
sources might be useful in other contexts (other academic courses, non-academic settings)? How
do you think the content you gathered during the semester might be useful in the future? What
tactics and strategies or what content knowledge might you be able to use in a different setting?
5. Provide feedback to at least two other classmates. Focus on common problems and different
approaches to problem solving. Be specific.