Archive for category: Nursing Assignment Help

Nurse Leadership

Establishing a Culture of Safety

Health Information Technology

For this discussion, you will address the following:

• Review the  paying particular attention to the case study on p. 13
• First, identify the two types of IT-related incidents
• Briefly describe the situation in the case study
• What type of IT incident is seen in this case study?
• What were the potential consequences to the patient in this case study?
• How can nurse leaders establish a culture of safety related to health IT?

Your initial post must be posted before you can view and respond to colleagues, must contain minimum of two (2) references, in addition to examples from your personal experiences to augment the topic. The goal is to make your post interesting and engaging so others will want to read/respond to it. Synthesize and summarize from your resources in order to avoid the use of direct quotes, which can often be dry and boring. No direct quotes are allowed in the discussion board posts.

References:

• Initial Post: Minimum of two (2) total references: one (1) from required course materials and one (1) from peer-reviewed references.

Words Limits

• Initial Post: Minimum 200 words excluding references (approximately one (1) page)

Also include introduction and conclusion

Nurse advocacy through legislation

You are required to cite to a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources
must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant
to nursing practice.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is
expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines

1,250 words

Anaesthetic Nurse Practitioner

Once you have critically appraised the articles you should summarise what the studies found and you need to discuss how the findings could be used in practice.

Reflect on value of the selected studies and whether they are of use in practice. If not, why? You could look at how the findings could be used for:

• Individual or groups of patients/clients

• For your benefit

• For your department

• For the organisation in general

• For society The choice is yours and you don’t have to cover all of the above points.

The Following aspects could be included but they are not prescriptive:

• The “fit” with other evidence, clinical policy, procedure and guidelines

• How the evidence “fits” with other research • If appropriate, consider how it “fits” with your experience in clinical practice

• Would this evidence change practice?

• How the evidence could be implemented in practice?

• Factors helping or hindering the implementation of the evidence

• How the findings fit with patient preferences

• Ethical issues with using the evidence

This part should continue to demonstrate analysis and arguments should be supported with references.  s

Implementation and Evaluation of Health Promotion/Risk Reduction Plan Proposal

 

Instructions
This assignment assesses the following intended course outcomes: 1.      Apply the nursing process and evidence-based practice to accurately assess family and community health systems. 2.      Apply systematic research practices to identify family and community health system needs. 3.      Discuss the multi-dimensional role of the community health nurse in risk reduction and health promotion. 4.      Discuss the multi-dimensional role of the community health nurse in risk reduction and health promotion. In this assignment you will use the health promotion/risk reduction education or intervention plan based on the need identified in the Community Health Promotion Plan Proposal. Develop/explain the process of implementation and evaluation for your Community Health Promotion Plan Proposal . Part of the development of the health promotion/risk reduction plan development is to include the implementation and evaluation phases of the plan. Support your processes with examples from studies you have read in this course. In the Introduction ·         State the recommendations from the Community Health Promotion Plan Proposal . In the implementation process, you are required to include the following: ·         Timeline for implementation and duration of the plan/intervention: state a reasonable amount of time for both based on findings from the literature. Be sure to cite your sources and explain the rationale behind the timeline. ·         Resources needed to implement: staffing (including level of education of required staff), physical space needed, location, sources of funding available. ·         Delivery of the plan: who are the community partners/stakeholders needed to implement the program? What is the point of delivery (an individual or community)? What specific interventions would be needed for the delivery? In the evaluation process, you are required to include or identify the following: ·         Data description: How will you measure the outcome (what tool will be used; include an example if possible)? How will data be collected/aggregated/stored? Who should receive the outcome data? How will the outcome data be used in additional planning? ·         Resources needed to conduct evaluation process: staffing needed (specialists needed to evaluate outcomes); what possible sources of funding for evaluation phase; what community partnerships and stakeholders should be involved in evaluation? ·         Summary/Conclusion: include expected outcomes based on the literature.  This assignment will be evaluated on the following criteria: Introduction/summary of the plan developed in Assignment 3 Part 1 10% Implementation 30% Timeline for implementation and duration of the plan (10%) Resources: space, physical location, staffing needs, and funding (10%) Delivery: community partners and stakeholders, point of delivery, and special interventions (10%) Evaluation 30% Description of the data collection and tool used to measure the outcome; future use of data for planning (10%) Resources needed for evaluation: staffing and funding needed (10%) Description of the community partners involved in the evaluation (10%) Summary/conclusion, including expected outcomes based on the findings from the literature 20% APA, spelling, grammar, and organization