Pathophysiology of Disorders and the alterations disorders examination

Pathophysiology of Disorders and the alterations disorders examination

This is an assignment that focuses on the Pathophysiology of Disorders and the alterations disorders examination. We are tolook at the changes these brings to the body.

Pathophysiology of Disorders and the alterations disorders examination

During the last 5 weeks, you have explored various body systems: neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, and hematological. These four systems work together along with other body systems to complete a myriad of functions. For this reason, when disorders occur within one body system, it can create potentially devastating effects throughout the entire body. For instance, Parkinson’s disease is a disorder of the central nervous system. However, its alterations actually affect multiple body systems from the cardiovascular system to the gastrointestinal system.

Instructions

In this Assignment, you examine alterations associated with disorders, as well as the impact of the alterations on multiple body systems. To Prepare From the list below, select a disorder of interest to you: Alzheimer’s disease Asthma in children Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Congestive heart failure Hepatic disease (liver disease) Hypertension Hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism Seizures Sepsis Identify alterations associated with your selected disorder. Consider the pathophysiology of the alterations.

Think about how these alterations produce pathophysiological changes in at least ‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍two body systems. Reflect on how patient factors such as genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, and behavior might impact the pathophysiology of the alterations you identified, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of your selected disorder. Review the “Mind maps—Dementia, Endocarditis, and Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)” media in the Week 2 Learning Resources. Use the examples in the media as a guide to construct a mind map for the disorder you selected. Consider the epidemiology and clinical presentation of your selected disorder.

To Complete Develop a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following: Describe your selected disorder, as well as associated alterations. Explain the pathophysiology of the alterations, including changes that occur in at least two body systems. Explain how genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, and behavior might impact the pathophysiology of the alterations you identified, as well as diagnosis and treatment of your selected disorder. Construct a mind map for the disorder you selected. Include the epidemiology, pathophysiology of alterations, risk factors, and clinical presentation, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of th‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍e disorder.

Evidence-based treatments for mental health conditions

Evidence-based treatments for mental health conditions

This is a paper that is focusing on the review on evidence-based treatments for mental health conditions. The paper also provides additional information to use in the writing of the assignment paper. Below is the assessment description to follow:

Review on evidence-based treatments for mental health conditions

The Topic – Neuromodulation treatment in Obsessive compulsive disorder. For example Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Deep Brain Stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, newer area like focused ultrasound

More info
Purpose: This paper is a research literature review on evidence-based treatments for mental health conditions. Theoretically, you will have an opportunity to explore a particular area of abnormal psychology in depth, critically evaluate research papers, and integrate theory, research and applications of abnormal psychology and treatments. The application is that you will discover what works best for treatment of the mental health condition you have chosen.

Details: This paper is a 6 (+/-1) page paper, excluding title page and references. No abstract is needed. The paper must be presented in APA format. Note that a new version of APA is available and you are welcome to use either the 6th or 7th edition.

Direction: Choose one of the specific mental health disorders from the textbook (e.g., social anxiety disorder, bipolar 2 disorder) and provide evidence for the most effective/efficacious psychological treatments for that particular disorder according to the research evidence. Try to narrow your topic as much as possible (e.g., “cognitive behavior therapy for performance subtype of social anxiety disorder” as opposed to “therapy for depression”). The more you can narrow the disorder, treatment, and topic, the easier it will be to write a study on the effectiveness of treatment.

Remember, ensure that the pages are exclusive of the cover and the reference pages. Also, ensure that you include all the references you use in finding research for this assignment paper. References should be at least three for the paper. All references, citation, and writing should follow the APA formatting and styling guidelines. Finally, ensure you focus on the assignment topic in detail.

Autonomy and ANA code of ethics provisions

Autonomy and ANA code of ethics provisions

This is an essay that discusses what does autonomy mean and ANA code of ethics provisions. The essay also looks keenly into Burkhardt & Nathaniel book.

What does autonomy mean and ANA code of ethics provisions

1. Firstly, read the Case Presentation on page 63 (in 4th Edition) of Burkhardt & Nathaniel. This is in Chapter 3, and is titled “Noncompliance vs Autonomy”: a. What does Autonomy mean to you? b. Discuss a minimum of two provisions from the ANA Code of Ethics and Interpretative Statements that would offer a nurse guidance in this case – to ensure that Cora’s autonomy was respected.

2. Secondly, read the Case Presentation on page 72 (in 4th Edition) in Burkhardt & Nathaniel. This is in Chapter 3, the case presentation “Beneficence and Nonmaleficence” and answer questions a-c below.

a. Discuss your thoughts as to whether or not the patient was harmed by the nothing by mouth order? (Have you ever had a patient with severe thirst, or experienced that feeling yourself?)

b. In your opinion what should have taken precedence – the NPO order or the patient’s thirst?

c. What ethical principles (listed p.59 in Burkhardt) are relevant in this case other than beneficence & nonmaleficence?

What does autonomy mean and ANA code of ethics provisions

3. Thirdly, read the Case Presentation, “Trying to Be Heard” on page 179, Chapter 7, in Burkhardt & Nathaniel. It is the last case study in Chapter 7; discuss A-C below: a. Does the ANA Code of Ethics, Provision Three (in particular, read 3.4 in its entirety) offer any guidance for the nurse? Why or why not? b. Were the nurse’s actions sufficient in this situation? c. Read the article titled, “Pathways to Moral Courage” (article link below) and apply the “CODE” analysis to the facts of Joanna’s case to determine if a different outcome was possible. Apply each letter of the acronym CODE to the facts of this case. Article link: Pathways to Moral Courage, found Pathways_to_Moral_Courage.pdf

4. Then, after reading the article links relating to Placebos that follow, please address:

a. Discuss both articles and then argue for or against the use of placebos. Include in your discussion a minimum of two applicable ethical principles, e.g. autonomy, beneficence, etc.

b. Discuss what provisions of the ANA Code of Ethics offer guidance on the topic of using placebos in health care. The focus of this discussion should not be on Code of Ethics provisions that apply to clinical trials. Article links: Read the American Society for Pain Management Nursing’s Position Statement on Use of Placebos in Pain Management, found at: UseofPlacebosinPainManagement.pdf Read “US Doctors Use Placebo Treatments but Don’t Always Inform Patients” found at: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/126791.php (Links to an external site.)

Care Delivery or Nursing Model Change on information delivery

Care Delivery or Nursing Model Change on information delivery

This is an assignment that focuses on the Care Delivery or Nursing Model Change. Additionally, this will be on top of how to deliver information.

Care Delivery or Nursing Model Change on information delivery

There will be times when the doctorally prepared advance practice nurse will need to suggest a nursing model change or a change in care delivery. It will be important for the doctorally prepared advanced practice nurse to have an understanding of how to deliver information and what information should be shared with an audience. Also, this assignment will give you practice with presentation software along with preparing you to provide specific information for your proposed changes.

This is a two-part assignment that will also give you practice in presenting to administrators.

General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included. • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Directions:

Part One:

Firstly, create a 12-15 slide presentation (PowerPoint, include slide notes or voice over; Prezi, include voice over) that presents a proposed care delivery or nursing model change for a department that aligns costs, quality, and health that supports the care of patients across the continuum. Include the following:

1. Background of issue

2. The proposed solution

3. How solution meets need of population (stakeholders, cost, and payer to proposed change)

4. Proposed change process to implement delivery model

5. Expected outcomes

6. Implications that are realistic and aligned with current and future health care financing 10 references

Part Two:

1. Secondly, present your presentation to at least one administrator.

2. Thirdly, write a brief summary, 100-250 words, of the feedback given to you by the administrator(s).

4 references

Lastly, you are to complete your assignment using real-world application. Additionally, real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course.

The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. with 15 SLIDES SPEECH/PRESE‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍NTATION

Comparison of Treatment Plans Mental Illness CBT vs Pharmacological Intervention

Comparison of Treatment Plans Mental Illness CBT vs Pharmacological Interventio

Comparison of Treatment Programs Identify a specific area of need and select two family support program models that can be applied to this specific population.

Comparison of Treatment Programs Identify a specific area of need

Firstly, Comparison of Treatment Programs Identify a specific area of need and select two family support program models that can be applied to this specific population.

Secondly, Compare and contrast the utility of each program.

Thirdly, Discuss which program you believe ultimately would be a more effective intervention.

Fourthly, Provide specific examples from the text and related journal articles to support your arguments.

More details:

What is effective treatment?
Effective treatment attends to multiple needs of the individual, not just his or her drug abuse. To be effective, treatment must address the individual’s drug abuse and any associated medical, psychological, social, vocational, and legal problems.

Research studies on addiction treatment typically have classified programs into several general types or modalities. Treatment approaches and individual programs continue to evolve and diversify, and many programs today do not fit neatly into traditional drug adiction treatment classifications.

Most, however, start with detoxification and medically managed withdrawal, often considered the first stage of treatment. Detoxification is the process by which the body clears itself of drugs. It ipurpose is to manage the acute and potentially dangerous physiological effects of stopping drug use. As stated previously, detoxification alone does not address the psychological, social, and behavioral problems associated with addiction and therefore does not typically produce lasting behavioral changes necessary for recovery. The aftermath of Detoxification is referral to drug addiction treatment.

It is accompanied by unpleasant and potentially fatal side effects stemming from withdrawal. Detoxification management is with medications from a physician in an inpatient or outpatient setting.  Therefore, it is refer to as “medically manage withdrawal.” Medications are available to assist in the withdrawal from opioids, benzodiazepines, alcohol, nicotine, barbiturates, and other sedatives.

 

 

40-year-old male with a persistent cough

40-year-old male with a persistent cough

Complete only the History, Physical Exam, and Assessment sections of the Aquifer virtual case: Family Medicine 13: 40-year-old male with a persistent cough.

Family Medicine 13: 40-year-old male with a persistent cough

Assignment
Complete only the History, Physical Exam, and Assessment sections of the Aquifer virtual case: Family Medicine 13: 40-year-old male with a persistent cough.

Scenario:
You are working in Dr. Wilson’s office. The first patient of the morning is Mr. Frank Dennison, a 40-year-old cisgender male.
As you and Dr. Wilson open the electronic medical record, you note past visits by Mr. Dennison for allergic rhinitis and refills of various antihistamines and nasal sprays. Then you look at today’s encounter which gives the following information:
Reason for visit: Cough for two months.
Vital signs:
Temperature is 36.8 C (98.2 F)
Pulse is 80 beats/minute
Respiratory rate is 16 breaths/minute
Oxygen saturation is 97%
Blood pressure is 118/68 mmHg
Height is 172.7 cm (68 in)
Weight is 86.2 kg (190 lbs)
Body mass index (BMI) is 28.9 kg/m2
Dr. Wilson asks you to “do a focused history, then let me know what you find.”
Before you go into the exam room, you review common conditions that can lead to a persistent cough.

HISTORY 1

Dr. Wilson has already obtained permission from the patient for you to see him.
You introduce yourself, and begin by asking:

“How may we help you today?”

Mr. Dennison responds, “I’ve had this nagging cough for two months.”

“Tell me more about your cough.”

“I don’t have a fever so I don’t think I have an infection. The cough is worse at night. In fact, I wake up some nights with coughing spells. Eventually, I cough up some clear mucous, and then I feel better. Sometimes I notice that my breathing gets noisy.”

 

“What kind of noise do you make when you are breathing?”

“It’s kind of a musical, whistling sound, especially when I breathe out.”

“How often do you notice this noisy breathing?”

“On one or two nights of the week, I will wake up coughing and get that noisy breathing at the same time. When I cough up some clear mucous, I feel better. I have never had the noisy breathing during the day. In fact, when I jog or bicycle, my breathing is fine.”

“Do you get any chest tightness or chest pain?”
“No.”

HISTORY 2

As you proceed to take the rest of Mr. Dennison’s history, you continue to consider the diagnosis of asthma. Bearing this in mind, you ask Mr. Dennison about his past medical history:

“I see that you have a history of allergic rhinitis. How is that going?”

“What medications do you take for this?”

 

“Why haven’t you been receiving your allergy shots regularly?”

“Let’s discuss some options to help you take your medications and receive your shots.”

Through these questions, you realize Mr. Dennison’s allergic rhinitis is not under ideal control. You wonder if treating his allergic rhinitis would help control his cough and wheezing.

Next, you wish to see if he has an underlying sinusitis since that also is a co-morbid condition of asthma that could explain some of his symptoms.

DISCUSSING DIFFERENT CLINICAL SCENARIOS

CLINICAL REASONING
You know that Mr. Dennison has had chronic nasal symptoms (sneezing, nasal congestion, and drainage) for three to four months, so it is unlikely that he has acute sinusitis. Dr. Wilson asks you to consider a different hypothetical scenario.
“What if Mr. Dennison presented with one week of upper respiratory symptoms including nasal congestion and drainage? On the day the symptoms began, he had a low-grade fever that has now resolved.

His nasal congestion persisted and he has now had yellow nasal drainage for five days with associated mild headaches. On exam, he is afebrile and in no distress. Examination of his tympanic membranes and throat are normal. Examination of his nose is unremarkable although a slight amount of yellowish-clear drainage is noted. There is tenderness when you lightly percuss his maxillary sinuses.”

ACUTE VERSUS CHRONIC TEACHING
You and Dr. Wilson turn your attention back to Mr. Dennison.
By definition, nasal symptoms lasting more than 12 weeks are not acute sinusitis. So you consider chronic sinusitis and recall what you know about the symptoms of chronic sinusitis and you realize with the patient’s chronic nasal congestion and mucopurulent drainage, he may have chronic sinusitis. There may be additional physical signs and diagnostic tests that will be needed later to confirm this.

HISTORY 3

“Do you have any other chronic conditions; have you had hospitalizations or surgeries?”

“Do you take any medications other than the ones we have discussed?”

“Do you have any allergies to any medications, particularly aspirin?”

“Have you ever smoked cigarettes or cigars or chewed tobacco?”

Mr. Dennison reports no alcohol or drug use. He lives with his wife and two children, who are all healthy. His father is deceased, but had allergic rhinitis and asthma.

You remember that there are still some potential asthma comorbid conditions to ask about such as overweight and obesity, gastroesophageal reflux disease, obstructive sleep apnea, stress and depression. Also, you review his current weight and BMI and note that his current BMI classifies him as overweight, but not obese.

You ask Mr. Dennison this series of questions and discover the review of systems is negative:
“Have you ever had any symptoms of heartburn?”

“Has your wife ever commented on the way you sleep—snoring a lot or breathing unusually?”

“How are you doing emotionally; are you stressed or depressed?”

You explain that you would like Mr. Dennison to change into a gown while you go discuss your findings thus far with Dr. Wilson. And, when you return in a moment, you will perform a physical exam.

You find Dr. Wilson in the hallway and give him a synopsis of the history you’ve obtained from Mr. Dennison.

Discussion Question 1

Based on your performance and the expert feedback in your HISTORY collection, describe two missed questions and your understanding of why they were important to collect for this case history. Use specific references from your text to explain.

Discussion Question 2
Based on your performance and the expert feedback in your PHYSICAL EXAM collection, describe two errors in your exam performance or documentation. Use specific references from your text to explain the importance of these findings in correct assessment of this client.

Discussion Question 3
Based on your performance on the PHYSICAL EXAM collection, describe one key finding that you included in your list and describe a specific physical exam that you can perform at the point-of-care to further evaluate the finding. Use specific references from your text.

Discussion Question 4

Based on your performance and the expert feedback in your ASSESSMENT identification of problem categories, choose one missed/incorrect category and use specific references from your text to explain the importance of this category in arriving at correct differential diagnoses for this client.

Discussion Question 5
Based on your performance and the expert feedback in your ASSESSMENT of differential diagnoses, describe one incorrect/missed differential diagnosis and use specific references from your text to support the inclusion of the diagnosis for this client.

Theoretical Framework to Support nursing theories on health care

Theoretical Framework to Support nursing theories on health care

This is an assignment that discusses the theoretical Framework to Support nursing theories on health care. Additionally, the paper analyzes the various theories in relation to nursing.

Theoretical Framework to Support nursing theories on health care

Purpose
Nurse practitioners actively engage in the process of translating nursing knowledge into practice, thereby establishing evidence-based approaches within the discipline.  Throughout this process, a theoretical framework provides a meaningful context to guide and support the evidence-based practice. The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can be used as a framework for a future evidence-based project during your nurse practitioner education.

Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Through this assessment, the student will meet the following Course Outcomes:
·        Apply nursing theory as a framework to guide the translation of knowledge and implementation of evidence-based practice in future professional settings.
·        Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components and also relationships among the components, and application to advanced nursing practice.

Requirements:
In Week 7, you will create a presentation using PowerPoint.
Criteria for Content
·       Review literature regarding issues or concerns within your selected nurse practitioner specialty.
·       Select a theory or model which is relevant to your nurse practitioner specialty and would offer a meaningful context for evidence-based practice surrounding the issue or concern which you identified.

In a PowerPoint Presentation, address the following.

  • Firstly, write an introduction to the presentation
  • Secondly, identify and describe a theory or model and explain its relevance to your nurse practitioner specialty.
  • Thirdly, describe an issue or concern that is related to your nurse practitioner specialty, and explain its impact on health care outcomes
  • Then, explain how the theory or model can be used as a framework to guide evidence-based practice to address the issue or concern, and discuss the unique insight or perspective offered through the application of this theory or model.
  • Conclusion to the presentation
  • References

Evidence Based Medicine Critical Appraisal study design

Evidence Based Medicine Critical Appraisal study design

This is an assignment that focuses on the evidence based medicine critical appraisal study. The paper also focuses on the study design and treatment.

Evidence Based Medicine Critical Appraisal study design

Scenario: You are reviewing Mr Burns, a 59-year-old chronic smoker who was admitted to the ED 6 days ago for an acute myocardial infarction (ST-segment elevation). He is now stable; however, his latest blood tests show slightly elevated LDL Cholesterol (2.2 mmol/L). Mr Burns is currently taking 40mg of simvastatin. You will also ask yourself, should I switch him from simvastatin 40mg to simvastatin 40mg + ezetimibe 10mg? Task: To help you in answering this question, you are to critically appraise the study “Ezetimibe added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary syndromes (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1410489) by answering the following questions: Study design questions

1. Firstly, what is the study design (e.g. RCT, cohort study, case series)? (0.5 mark)

2. Secondly, was the study placebo controlled? What was the study placebo controlled for? (1 mark)

3. Thirdly, are the treatment and control groups comparable? (1 mark)

4. Fourthly, why are blinding techniques used in clinical trials? Who was blinded in this trial? (1 mark)

5. Then, was the analysis methodology (of results) plan a priori or post-hoc? (1 mark)

6. Also, who funded the study? Are there any conflicts of interests involving researchers / investigators and is this likely to have biased the study findings? (1.5 marks)

7. Lastly, was the primary endpoint/outcome measure in this study clinically appropriate? (1 mark) Statistical Analysis, Reporting of Results and also Clinical Significance Questions

1. Were the results (of the primary endpoint) statistically significant (p< 0.05 or 95% CI relative risk/hazard ratio does not include 1)? (1 mark) 2. Secondly, determine the absolute risk increase (ARI) and numbers needed to harm (NNH) for this study with regards to reported myopathy adverse events between treatment groups. Are myopathy related events significantly more common in the intervention group? Comment on the risks of rhabdomyolysis or myopathy reported between treatment groups. (2.5 marks) 3. Who is the corresponding (primary) author for the report? Would he/she be an ‘Opinion leader’ in their field? (1 mark)

4. Additionally, is the data applicable to the current patient (age, sex, race, etc.)? (1 mark) 5. If Mr Burns had very impaired renal function (e.g. calculated creatinine clearance <20ml/min) would the study findings be applicable to him? (0.5 mark) 6. Were appropriate doses usage in the study? (1 mark) 7. Subsequently, what is the quality of the journal in which the results were report? (0.5 mark) 8. Is the report complete e.g. full article, or an abstract/poster? (0.5 mark) 9. Lastly, are the results from this trial clinically relevant for Mr Burns? (Non-assessed item)

Evidenced-based data gathered from international national state

Evidenced-based data gathered from international national state

This week we will be using evidenced-based data, gathered from international, national, state and local government and agency websites to assess the health of a community (defined as a county in our course).

evidenced-based data gathered from international national state

This week we will be using evidenced-based data, gathered from international, national, state and local government and agency websites to assess the health of a community (defined as a county in our course).

Objective: Integrate assessment data from national, state and local sources into community planning.

In order to meet this objective you must:

Firstly, Read Chapters 10, 12, and 20 in your text.

Secondly, Review County Health Statistics – population characteristics. and indicators of health.

Thirdly, Go to this website and work through the (Module 1) determinants of health section: http://www.aptrweb.org/pophealthmodules

Fourthly, Using these and other websites please answer the Application Exercise questions below and post to ASULearn.

Further, Youth Risk Behavior Survey http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs/index.htm

Moreover, Healthy People 2030 www.healthypeople.gov

Further, Healthy Carolinians www.healthycarolinians.org

Also, NC Center for Health Statistics https://schs.dph.ncdhhs.gov/

Additionally, County Health Rankings http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/#app/north-carolina/2012

NC Oral Health https://www2.ncdhhs.gov/dph/oralhealth/stats/MeasuringOralHealth.htm

 

Substance Abuse Statistics

 

Some of you may find numbers for your county (like Mecklenburg) but in rural counties statistics may not be available. You can report this answer using NC data if that is the most specific information you can find. If anyone stumbles across any additional helpful links please share them!

http://www.rwjf.org/en/library/articles-and-news/2013/09/interactive–prescription-drug-abuse.html

Additional Dental Health Links- if you can’t find county specific information you can report NC data for this question too.

https://www2.ncdhhs.gov/dph/oralhealth/stats/

https://www2.ncdhhs.gov/dph/oralhealth/

http://www.ncfahp.org/nc-oral-health-collaborative.aspx

Application Exercise:

Please find data from local, state and national websites/databases and /or interview local health care professionals to answer the following questions about your county.

1. Demographic data (age, race, gender, education levels, employment/unemployment rates and household income) about the people in your county.

2 The 3 leading causes of death in your county.

3 The 3 leading causes of admissions to the local EDs (You may have to call the hospital to obtain this information).

4 The teen pregnancy rate in your county. (Please note this is reported as a rate not a percentage)

5 The childhood immunization rates for your state or county.

6 Percentage of people in your county using mental health services.

7 Percentage of people in your county with substance abuse problems.

8 The percentages by age of people in your county who are obese.

9 Data about the dental health of people in your county. (you may need to be creative in how you measure)

10 What programs are currently offered in your county health department?

Community health disparities in the nursing field

Community health disparities in the nursing field

This is a paper that focuses on the examination of Health disparities issue in the nursing field. The paper also reviews morbidity or mortality.

Examination of Health disparities issue in the nursing field

T‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍he purpose of the paper is to critically examine a health disparities topic in their discipline . Additionally, to research literature in nursing and other disciplines to develop a proposal for addressing the health disparities issue you chose. Explore research on your topic.

In your paper:

Consequently, you will summarize evidence on disparities related to your topic and identify factors that contribute to those disparities. Next, you will propose solutions to address the health disparity, considering factors at the individual provider-patient, organizational, policy, and societal/structural levels.

Your paper should reflect your evolving understanding of how nursing (or your health profession. If you are not a nursing student) you can contribute to health equity. Write a 3 page paper, using APA formatting (OWL at Purdue APA Formatting/Style Guide is very useful). Topic guidelines: Rather than choosing a cultural, racial or ethnic group as a starting point, think about clinical diagnoses that interests you such as hypertension, a type of cancer in a given population, diabetes, sickle cell, HIV, prenatal care; or care settings such as ICUs, emergency services, or primary and preventive care settings. For example, you can choose specific topics such as racial disparities in bariatric surgery, disparities related to veterans primary care, or care for patients with deafness, etc. You can also choose a global health or community health topic. There are many possibilities.

Draft Guidelines:

1. You might introduce the topic and review available data on morbidity/mortality; differences in outcomes among certain groups; challenges in providing equitable care (e.g., cultural, language, gender, or other barriers, such as lack of insurance or access, discriminatory processes/policies) as identified in the research literature.

2. Paper details. This should include your plan for reducing disparities. Also, in achieving health equity, involving at least three levels of intervention (see 1-4 below). You should submit this paper in APA format if you want feedback on APA, citations, references list, etc. In your discussion of interventions/solutions, present evidence from scientific literature and suggestions made by scholars on your topic. You can also apply knowledge on reducing disparities from other sources not directly related to your topic as long as they are appropriate.