Security Communication Plan

/in /by

Security Communication Plan

According to Keston (2013), “A mark of a mature security communications program is the shift away from one-time messages, such as ad hoc emails. Such messages are easily forgotten and are often hard to find after a few weeks. A good security communications plan will include sending updates and alerts as well as maintaining a repository of documentation. Creating such a repository (or a consolidated document) makes information easier to find, and it helps to link together disparate elements into a unified plan.” For the purpose of this assignment, you are tasked as the Cybersecurity Director to prepare a Security Communications Plan for execution at the program level. You are to develop a security communications plan for your organization that addresses the handling of all communications related to security. Follow the requirements below: 1) 4 – 6 Pages in length in APA format (not including a cover page and reference section) 2) Cover Page 3) Develop a comprehensive security plan that does the following: a) Identify archiving procedures b) Establish approval processes for sending communications c) Describe legal and regulatory requirements d) Define key terms e) Define severity levels and message types f) Using the definitions of severity levels and message types, diagram who receives messages and through what means they receive them (e.g., text messages) g) The plan will address the concerns of many constituents, including executives, IT staff members, and end users, as well as customers and partners. Each group has somewhat different needs, so it is helpful to structure a plan to protect sensitive information from the entire group and to make targeted information easy for its audience to find. 4) Reference Section

Global Imbalances and the trade slowdown

/in /by

Global Imbalances and the trade slowdown

Global Imbalances and the trade slowdown

1. Define trade imbalances

2. Indicate the different hypothesis and the reasons given by Freud for her own conclusions

3. Your paper should explain what the topic is about, why it is interesting/important/relevant in general and what specific points make it especially interesting/important/relevant from your point of view. It is best if it also provides examples or cases and explain in greater details the most important points you want your readers to understand and to know about your topic.

4. Please be more precise, precise, precise, don’t broad!!!

5. Please read the paper that I provide!!! Follow the paper!!!

6. Correlated to international trade! My course topic is ECON 443: International trade……After reading the paper, the author may declaim: Saving and investment caused imbalances and trade slowdown???

7. Introduction, Contents, Conclusion

8. Use general words and vocabularies, easy to follow and understand

9. Explore your ideas and thinkings and understandings. Please don’t quote a lot.

10. It’s my final paper for my graduation! Please treat as your own paper!!! I really appreciate it~ Love u

Securiy Management Systems and Processes

/in /by

Securiy Management Systems and Processes

Securiy Management An Introduction By author P.J. Ortmier  Term paper on Security management An Introduction By author P.J. Ortmeir This is a 15 page (typed and doubled spaced)term paper, with no less than 15 peer-reviewed journal articles. There should be no plagiarism. The paper should be in APA format The words should be typed in 12 font, Times New Roman Subheadings are mandatory Pages must be numbered There are 10 chapters ensure that relevance is brought to the pages on each as well as following the scholarly article outline (make the paper sing) This paper must include the format of a scholarly article (outline) as follows:

• Title page

• Abstract

• Introduction

• Theoretical Framework

• Review of relevant literature

• The extent of the problem (that includes relevant data, if necessary)

• Recommendations for policy or further research

• Conclusion

• References Please ensure that the writer is proficient in criminal justice (utilizing criminal justice terms), versatile in security issues and problems Keep your focus clear throughout. Otherwise, those interesting related issues you delved into might end up looking like window dressing, added only to bring the paper up to its required minimum length. Profs see enough fluff that they generally smell it a mile away. Kind of like a sixth sense, or a really obscure super power. In your first draft, say what you have to say, then punch it up or trim it down as need be. Neatness Does Count – Spelling and grammar will be considered in grading your paper. The point of writing papers is to teach you to organize your thoughts, and express them in a clear and coherent fashion, in the proper style. Be sure to insert page numbers, and check for “widows and orphans, lines stranded at the top or bottom of the page. Every word processor has a spelling checker. Use it on your final draft! Write From The Heart. Your paper (for better or worse) should be a reflection of yourself. If your topic is important enough to you to spend all that time researching and writing about, let your feelings show. Anybody can throw together a pile of photocopied articles and piece a paper together from their spare parts. Make this a labor of love. Well OK, sincere affection. Whatever. Try to get into it, you have to endure the process in any event. Your opinions are important too (surprise!). In some respects, your opinions are the most important part of the paper. If you don’t genuinely care about your topic, you’re going to have a hard time getting me excited about it when I have to sit down and read your paper. It doesn’t mean a thing, if it ain’t got that swing. The chapters of the book will be forwarded to the email of support. Thank you

Electronic Communication Plan

/in /by

Electronic Communication Plan

Deliverable 4 – Electronic Communication Plan Academic Level : Bachelor Paper details Competency Use technological tools and strategies to improve engagement between families and professionals. Scenario You are the director of an accredited early childhood program. You understand the importance of communication with your program families and value the perspective of the parents and guardians, supporting the Developmentally Appropriate Practice guideline of establishing reciprocal relationships with families. Your program’s Parent Advisory Board (PAB) agrees with you and has indicated its desire to increase and improve the program’s online presence and use of technological communication tools, based on the preferences indicated by parents and staff in a recent program communications survey. Therefore, the PAB has assigned to you the task of developing an electronic communication plan toward better connecting the children, families, and staff of the program. Instructions Use the provided Electronic Communication Plan template to demonstrate how to connect children, families, and colleagues across your early childhood program community. You will identify four electronic/social media options for communication using the template to compile the necessary information. Your identified electronic communication options must include a description and sample of these electronic options: One-page Program Newsletter – to share program information with the community Daily child record – to directly communication with parents and guardians about the child’s experiences at the program Email – how program staff communicate with parents and guardians about individual or specific matters An additional sample and explanation of your choice of an electronic/social media option Be sure the format and organization of your plan is professionally presented by including the following elements: Use of the provided template “Electronic Communication Plan”

Early prototype demo

/in /by

Early prototype demo

Oral Presentation OP1: Early prototype demo Assessment Brief: You should give a formal presentation of your progress so far and demonstrate an early prototype of your project. You will also discuss with your supervisor their expectations on your progress at this stag of the project according to the work plan presented in your proposal and your final objectives. Criteria: Literature review progress Analysis and design tasks undertaken (for design project) A clear set of requirements been gathered? Adequate analysis been undertaken? Progress made on the project design?

Social Disorganization Impact Family Dynamics

/in /by

Social Disorganization Impact Family Dynamics

Every new study does not have to reinvent the wheel – there have likely been studies conducted in the past that focus on similar research questions. It is important to identify those studies and discuss what they can tell us for a variety of reasons: 1) It gives us an idea of what is currently known or unknown about a given issue, 2) it can give use a baseline from which we can compare the results of our own study, and 3) it can suggest directions for future research. In essence, a good literature review contextualizes your own study. Your literature review will contain the following elements: 1. Introduce the Research Question: Briefly (1-2 pages) provide the context for the study and introduce the reader to what your research question is. You should include a statement like: “The research question guiding this literature review is… [insert your question here].” (the question usually goes toward the end of the introduction) 2. Literature Narrative: Write a brief literature review (8-10 pages), informed by the studies that you located. I suggest using past research on your topic to guide what should be included in your literature review. Consider this a narrative write up of the information that you provided in your literature table, with a review of the existing published literature on your topic. You will have to present empirical information (using the studies you located) regarding the following:  Describe the problem or program/ policy you have chosen, making the case for why it is important using scholarly literature.  Review some information on what is known about your problem or the effectiveness of your policy or program using scholarly literature.  DO NOT write an article by article summary, as this is not a scholarly review of the literature. Remember the key components of a literature review we discussed in class and refer back to the slides from those two lectures – summarize existing literature, analyze it, and critique it.  Effective literature reviews cover as much of the literature as possible. As such, the expectations for number of references will be higher than for the literature table; the “required” amount of references is highly dependent on the research question. 3. APA Citations and References: Throughout the literature narrative, please use the appropriate parenthetical (i.e., in-text) citations, and then provide a reference list at the end of your document. Use the information below as a template for appropriate citations

Why Liberals Should Hate Hate Crime Legislation

/in /by

Why Liberals Should Hate Hate Crime Legislation

Description

Use the following scheme to mark essay assignments. It describes the basic components that you should include in your essay: Your position on the issue: /2 (POS) Argument(s) for your position: /3 (ARG) Objection(s) to your argument(s): /3 (OBJ) Response(s) to the objection(s): /2 (RES) Writing, grammar and style: /2 (WRIT) Total: /12 (See top of Course Outline for actual % course weight) Defending a position crafted in consideration of what a thoughtful opponent might say is the core of the discipline of philosophy and of good essay writing. Such objections can be drawn from research into the contending positions on an issue, such as you might uncover as you consider the different ethical outlooks covered in this course, your imagination, research or conversations with others. Start your essay by working out a preliminary position. Any research should focus on finding support for this position (relevant facts or supporting arguments from authorities, etc). When you have an argument or two worked out, use these specific arguments as guides for subsequent research into possible thoughtful objections. If you believe you can respond to those objections then you are done. If you can’t, then either modify your conclusion or the reasons you have for drawing your conclusion (“premises”) until you have an argument that can stand-up to thoughtful opposition. Your final essay should include only your best argument(s) for your position, the most thoughtful objection(s) and your response(s) to those objections. (1200 words. 50% of course grade)

195101
Nov 29, 7:38 AM

Keith Culver and Michael Giudice (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Law. Broadview. Third Edition, 2017. ISBN: 978-1-55481-252-3

Happiness philosophies about happiness

/in /by

Happiness philosophies about happiness

Purpose and AudienceThroughout the course, you have been focusing on one of the philosophies about happiness as represented in one or more of our classical texts (Boethius, Aristotle, Aquinas) and as represented in another work of art(novel, poem, play, movie, album, painting, etc) of your own choosing. Your current goal is to argue for a particular insight about the work of art’s representation of the philosophy as compared with its representation in the classical text, to support your argument with analysis of textual evidence from both of these primary texts, and to engage in conversation with scholarly articles or books (secondary texts).This project is a thoroughly researched, thesis-driven, argumentative essay that demonstrates competence in both research and composition. The audience is our class —a diverse group of people who may be neutral or slightly skeptical regarding your position. In other words, you will need to persuade your readers. TopicAt this point, you are committed to the topic you discussed during your individual conferences. You must be able to conduct research about your topic in scholarly books and peer-reviewed journals. The topic should also be limited to a manageable focus so that the paper can adequately discuss every major aspect of the issue in detail and fairly consider the major opinions on the topic within a coherent essay. Finally, your topic must be approved by your instructor. ContentThis essay must be a thesis-driven argument. The essay should have an identifiable introduction, body, and conclusion. Include an interesting and informative title. The Introduction should grab the reader’s attention and provide necessary background information on the topic, provide a focus for the paper, and state a clear and precise thesis. The Body of the essay should offer a clear argument driven by textual proof and your own argumentation as well as clear engagement with the critical sources. Your essay should employ sound reasoning as it defends the thesis through logical argumentation and presentation of sound evidence. It should contain no material that is not directly relevant to the thesis.Explanations should be detailed and coherent and should avoid vague or generalized assertions. Examples, illustrations, and supporting detail should be used frequently and appropriately to demonstrate the validity of the thesis. The essay should also present criticisms of the thesis (i.e., counterarguments) fairly, and it should address such criticisms rationally and appropriately. You may integrate any relevant portion of your previous essays and/or parts of your annotated bibliography into this essay if you revise them for this new rhetorical purpose. The Conclusion should bring adequate closure to the paper. While it should reemphasize the thesis, it should also avoid excessive repetition of previous points. It should also address the reasons the overarching implications of the topic on the reading audience. Why does this issue matter?OrganizationThis essay can be organized in a number of ways, but it should be organized in a manner that best fits the essay’s content. Regardless of the particular organizational pattern chosen, the essay should employ logical organization and progression of thought, clear and smooth transitions, and coherent and developed paragraphs. At some point, the essay must address possible objections to its thesis, but the exact place of such rebuttal in the essay will depend on the organizational pattern chosen. SourcesThis essay must use and cite a minimum of eight sources. It must use at least six scholarly sources (books, peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) and two primary sources (your work of art and your classical text). In addition, the essay may cite sources from other credible media such as newspaper articles, popular periodicals, government documents, published interviews and speeches, studies, surveys, etc. However, you should avoid on dictionaries or encyclopedias unless they provide information not available elsewhere, which is a highly unlikely situation. Do not rely on only one or two sources for the majority of your information. All quotations must be quoted exactly and attributed to the proper source. Quotations should be smoothly integrated into the paper and should also be explained adequately. The essay may not use more than four block quotations (quotations four lines or longer) and may not use more than 750 total words (about two and a half, double-spaced pages) of quoted material. DocumentationMLA citation must be used correctly and consistently throughout the essay and the works cited page. In-text citations should be used whenever you are using a quotation, a paraphrase, or even a summary of an idea from a source. You can find the guidelines for the MLA 8 format in the course textbook or at www.purdue.edu/owl. The works cited page must be arranged alphabetically by the authors’ last names and must give full, accurate bibliographic information for each source. The works cited page should list only those works that are actually cited in the text, and every citation in the text must clearly refer to a citation on the works cited page. Lastly, remember to evenly double-space your works cited page and indent every line after the first by ½”.TechnicalitiesThis essay must be at least eight full pages long, but should not exceed 12 pages. Papers shorter than eight full pages will receive grade deductions. The paper should be double-spaced in 12-pt. Times New Roman font with 1” margins. Do not use a title page. Further Directions and WarningsMainly, this paper should combine your own thinking and argumentation with that of outside sources. The thesis should be your own, and sources should be used to support the thesis. You should use sources primarily to provide factual information or to offer a unique viewpoints and profound statements from specific authors. In no case should you use sources as “padding” to make the essay longer. If the essay demonstrates noticeable ignorance of important aspects of the topic, this will substantially lower the grade. Therefore, you should not procrastinate in doing research for this project, as you will need to be familiar with all important aspects of the topic. Finally, please note, I will not accept your research paper if I have not approved your topic and seen your work in progress (i.e., an annotated bibliography, an outline, and rough drafts in process). You must produce an acceptable research paper in order to pass this course.A Final ReminderI cannot stress this enough: SAVE everything that you do on at least two different storage devices (flash drive, Box, etc.) and at the end of every work session, email what you have completed to yourself. An excuse such as “my computer won’t read my flash drive” is not acceptable when it comes to your research essay. Must use the prince and nicomachean ethics

Sport Marketing Book Review

/in /by

Sport Marketing Book Review

HHPS 7334 Sport Marketing Book Review Assignment You may have written a book report before that was a simple summary of a book. OK, so that ensured (more or less) that you read the book, but was pretty mindless and boring. That is NOT what this book review assignment is about. The idea of a professional book review is to briefly summarize the ideas of the book, but mainly to give your opinion about the book’s merits… it is a critical analysis of the book. “Critical” means that you are going to evaluate objectively whether the author has fulfilled their objectives in the book, and whether they have used persuasive evidence to support their claims. Did you find the book engaging? Persuasive? Did you agree with it? Did you enjoy it? Would you recommend it to others? What is the intended audience of the book? Does it succeed in reaching this audience? Your book review should be readable to a general audience that may not have read the book… it should flow well and be explanatory. You should have an introduction, discussion of the book, and clear conclusion (although these don’t have to be broken into explicit sections, you can write this like an essay). Include: • The title and author of the book you are reviewing • The author’s objective(s) and audience • The author’s main arguments • Your evaluation of the author’s support of his/her arguments (provide examples) • Comparison with material presented on at least one major theme presented in the course (provide examples) and cite your textbook • Your conclusions about the book Use no less than 3, but no more than 4 pages to address the above issues. Use APA formatting for text. A cover page isn’t necessary, but a reference page is. Utilize in-text citations whenever you use material from your reviewed book or your textbook. I have chosen 3 marketing books that provide some interesting ideas regarding modern-day marketing. Choose one to review. You can order a book, but you can also use library resources. The Ottenheimer library does not have these books, but can get them for you through Interlibrary Loan. The Central Arkansas Library has copies available. I recommend utilizing these resources early in the semester… Interlibrary Loan sometimes takes a few weeks. Your choices are: • Jon Spoelstra (2009). Ice to Eskimos: How to Market a Product Nobody Wants. Harper Collins Publishers..

Financial Econometrics – TIME SERIES ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING

/in /by

Financial Econometrics – TIME SERIES ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING

The written report should be 1,000 words (plus or minus 10%) in length (including, introduction, main report and conclusion, but not the reference list), word-processed and should be of a professional format suitable for the audience.

FORMAT OF REPORT – Executive summary, introduction, logical structure, clear explanation and appropriate referencing. The majority of the marks will be given to students that produce evidence of:

• A good understanding of time series analysis.

• A good understanding of time series regression analysis and forecasting.

• Critical thinking in the interpretation of the findings.