Archive for category: Homework Assignment Help

Breul Article Reflection Discussion high priority goals

This essay entails a paper on Breul Article Reflection Discussion and a way of setting the high priority goals. Breul Article Reflection Discussion helps in understanding the procedure of setting aims of a project and analyze them for the success of a company.

Breul Article Reflection Discussion high priority goals

The first part if the initial discussion I am required to write then after that you have to respond to a student discussion post that I will copy below. Please cite all work. As part of this Discussion, you need to identify one “golden line” from the article.

As noted earlier, a golden line is a sentence or quote in the reading that caught your attention. Specifically, identify your golden line and briefly describe why it caught your interest. Post your golden line and the accompanying explanation using the using the Lesson 5 Breul Article Reflection Discussion Forum. Your post needs to be 75–100 words in length. You also need to comment on at least one of your fellow students’ postings.

The Each comment should be 50–75 words in length. Also, please response to the student post below: Douglas Post: Golden Line: “The legislation would require all departments and agencies not only to set high-priority goals but also develop a plan to accomplish each priority goal. I chose this line because it generally conforms with the tenets of SMART. As highlighted by Poister et al. in chapter 4, by intimating that the policy should be specific, measurable, and realistic.

As such, considering this line within the context of SMART objectives. It is apparent that specifying high-priority real-world goals, developing a plan to achieve these goals within a specified time frame, and regularly monitoring progress, is the right initial path to take.

However, while the idea behind the bill seems reasonable, in order for it to be effective, particularly considering SMART guidelines, it is still critical that policy makers and managers emphasize clarity.

Rachel Ulmer Group dynamics involvement in team selection

This is an assignment that focuses on Rachel Ulmer Group dynamics involvement in selection. The paper also discusses the involvement of various team members in Riverbend city.

Rachel Ulmer Group dynamics involvement in team selection

R‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍ead and explain in your own words what you understand about this discussion? Group Dynamics

Firstly, the task for this Riverbend City activity is to assemble a Training Curriculum Development Team. This is for your local police department to help with the needs of the LGBT community in your department. This is as result of your officer Paige Flannigan recently came out as being transgender. The Chief already selected two people he is placing on your team. You are also tasked with selecting the other four to six members you will be working with. Additionally, an important part of group dynamics in the workplace is making sure the people you select have a background that would benefit the team’s goals. Additionally,  as well as people who will all work well with each member of the team.

The two people selected by Chief Edwards are Lee Khang, Police Chaplain and also Felicity Pearson, (RCCLU). Representative. Mr. Khang has a can-do attitude and seems to be very accepting of others choices no matter his personal beliefs.  Ms. Pearson has beneficial experience working with diversity matters and seems steadfast on helping the police department transition. Out of the ten people Chief Edwards gave you to assemble your team from you chose six of them. This include Jonathan Barnegat, Riverbend City Human Resource Manager, Amelia Carter-Green, Police Union Representative. The others are Gerald Daniels, Corporal, April Nguyen, President of Riverbend City LGBT Alliance, Nolan Rosenberg, Secretary of Riverbend City LGBT Alliance, and Brianne Twyha, Social Worker.

The four other options were : Craig Sin‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍gleton, Corporal, Joy Palmquist, Administrative Assistant, Father Junot Rivera, Catholic Priest, and Mo Xiong, Riverbend City Diversity Liaison.

Group dynamics

I chose Amelia because she was adamant about making sure everyone’s feelings are being heard and valued. Then, I chose Gerald over Craig (both as current department employees) because Gerald seemed more welcoming to the potential upcoming changes than Craig did when interviewed. I chose April and Nolan for their work with the LGBT Alliance in the community. They both have experience assisting with this spectrum of issues. Nolan is a member of the LGBT community himself and could probably provide some beneficial insight into how it can be managed from an insider’s perspective.

Lastly, I chose Brianne because she is serious about making sure that the rights of everyone in the department are not infringed upon. I chose these team members because I believe each has the right mindset necessary to help facilitate beneficial changes at Riverbend Ci‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍ty Police Department.

Case of Atkins vs Virginia – the Death Penalty Information Center

Research the case of Atkins vs Virginia using the following link from the Death Penalty Information Center: What did the court rule in the case? How did the court define mental retardation?

the case of Atkins vs Virginia -the Death Penalty Information Center

Firstly, Research the case of Atkins v. Virginia using the following link from the Death Penalty Information Center:

https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/intellectual-disability-and-death-penalty?scid=28&did=176 (Links to an external site.)

Secondly, What did the court rule in the case?

Thirdly, How did the court define mental retardation?

Fourthly, Are there problems with the definition?

Further, How do various states interpret the ruling?

Moreover, Do you agree or disagree with the ruling? Why?

Is the law on intellectual disabilities too vague? If so, how could the law be corrected?

Are there disparities in determining intellectual disabilities?

More details;

How might Kolbert improve her rhetorical strategies

This is an assignment that discusses How might Kolbert improve her rhetorical strategies to address her audience. The paper also discusses using the Kolbert book.

How might Kolbert improve her rhetorical strategies

The Sixth Extinction, An Unnatural history by Elizabeth Kolbert (book) Chapter 1 (Golden Frogs of Panama)

I. Introduction:

A. Use your introduction to establish the rhetorical context and to provide a brief summary of the author’s argument. Remember your ideal audience is not familiar with the text, and so they need you to establish some pertinent facts before they can understand your rhetorical analysis.

B. Thesis Statement/Claim: Make sure your thesis answers these questions: How does the chapter you’ve selected attempt to persuade its audience? What is its overall rhetorical strategy? What is admirable or commendable in the text that you could imitate in your own academic writing? How might you use it in a later paper for either this class or another course that you are taking or are planning to take? Or, if you find the rhetorical strategies in the chapter problematic, what is problematic about them? Also, how might Kolbert improve her rhetorical strategies to address her audience?

II. Body:

Repeat A-C for as many body paragraphs as needed Although the terms we have introduced are important for understanding rhetoric, I am more interested in you demonstrating your understanding of these concepts rather than merely deploying the vocabulary. “Kolbert uses ethos” is a weak argument that doesn’t tell me you understand the concept nor does it tell me how he “uses” ethos. Rather it is better to say something like this: “Early on in the introduction, Kolbert develops her authority as a researcher in order to gain the trust of her audience by…” Rather than focusing your attention on a formula, work on crafting interesting, thoughtful, specific ideas.

How might Kolbert improve her rhetorical strategies to address her audience

Show your understanding of rhetoric by explaining the quality of the author’s persuasive techniques. You do not need to explicitly use terms like ethos, pathos, and logos. Topic sentence w/transition: What will this paragraph discuss?

A. Evidence/Examples:

Provide context for your argument summaries and paraphrases in your own words and sentence structure, as well as some brief, correctly integrated direct quotations.

B. Explanation/Commentary/Analysis:

Explain the example and how it has to do with the author persuading their audience of their thesis/claim. In other words, connect your evidence to your own thesis/claim.

C. Concession/Counter-claim & Rebuttal:

At least one paragraph must provide refutation for an opposing argument against at least one of the main points presented in the body. Often, this can be done within the body paragraph in which a controversial claim is made. III. Conclusion: Examine ideas presented in your essay. Your conclusion should avoid merely restating your thesis. Your conclusion should also answer the question “so what?” Why is what you have told you reader important?

Contrast and compare between Augustine and Pelagius

This is an assignment that discusses the contrast and comparison between Augustine and Pelagius. The paper also discusses the biblical interpretations of salvation.

The contrast and comparison between Augustine and Pelagius

Select a scripture verse or a passage
Show the contrast and/or comparison between Augustine, Pelagius, St. Prosper, Aquinas, Calvin’s position(s) and also their Biblical interpretation of Salvation
As you read about St. Augustine, St. Prosper, Pelagius, John Calvin and Thomas Aquinas and their particular interpretation of Salvation, consider the following:

I. The Historic Context
Firstly, what was the time period in which these theologians were writing? (e.g., 16th Century Europe)
Secondly, what were the spiritual (church or religious factors of Roman Catholicism or the Reformation that influenced their writings and interpretations of Scripture?) (e.g., Traditions, Rites, [Edicts]Rules by Popes, Cardinals, Bishops), Socio-economic and spiritual conditions in Europe (e.g., poverty, fear of damnation, a wrong view of the person of God [The Trinity], The politics of Rulers, Princes, Kings, Persecution of so called heretics, etc.)

II. Biblical Context/Tools

Remember, focus on the context of the verse; both Old and New Testaments.
Use contrast and comparison of these authors
Look for similarities and also differences in the author’s positions on salvation. Additionally, what are they?
Show where you agree with their position on salvation or where you disagree; are you for or against. Be brief but specific [give chapter and verse in the assigned textbook(s) references and Biblical passages to support or reject their particular view.

Your paper must contain 1) the title page, 2) the table of content page and 3) the bibliography page.  You must use at least 5 sources.

Sample Outline/the Table of Content

I. Introduction
Your introduction must contain a thesis statement
II. Historical Context
A. Socio-economic conditions during the time of John Calvin
B. Religious/Ecclesiastical Conditions of the time
C. Political Conditions during that time
III. Biblical Context
A. Context of the Passage in the Old Testament
B. Context of the Passage in the New Testament
C. Similarities and also Differences of John Calvin’s view’ of Predestination with other theologians (Augustine, Pelagius, Thomas Aquinas, St. Prosper, etc)
IV. Analysis
This section should also cover your agreement or disagreement with John Calvin’s view on Predestination with solid reasons and evidence from the scholarly sources.
V. Conclusion
MLA/APA/Turabian FORMAT

Any and all research or reflection papers MUST be written using the MLA Manual of Style or APA or Turabian. Your Professor prefer the Turabian format
You can access OWL to find examples of both papers, works cited pages, and how to create in-text citations of references. Go to OWL @Purdue University. Leo University also has an online learning lab.
Citationmachine.net will also help you create citations by filling in the appropriate blanks.