Primary source analysis from American Yawp

/in /by

This paper is on Primary source analysis from American Yawp. Consider who wrote your source, why was it written, who was the intended audience, what can we learn from it?

Primary source analysis from American Yawp

Consider who wrote your source, why was it written, who was the intended audience, what can we learn from it?  1-2 pages

http://www.americanyawp.com/reader.html

How to Analyze a Primary Source

More details;

Primary sources are the raw materials of history:

written accounts, physical objects, and visual material allow historians to build narratives and construct arguments.

Letters, diaries, written publications, laws, artwork, buildings, skeletal remains, environmental data, and even oral histories can all provide the first-hand evidence that historians need to make convincing arguments about the past and to properly evaluate the historical arguments made by others. Historians work primary sources into secondary and even tertiary sources: the books and textbooks assigned to students. They all rely, one way or another, on primary sources.

Students of history must know how to analyze and critically evaluate primary sources, for primary sources can distort as much as they reveal. The voice of slaves, for instance, can be drown out by the letters and journals of slaveholders.

We can produce more honest histories by interrogating our sources, asking questions such as, Who created this source? Who was their audience? How might their beliefs and perspectives have influenced their understanding? In the case of slavery, for instance, a critical eye is often need to read between the lines and uncover forgotten histories hidden within the materials available to us. Additionally, historians must make the most of the sources they have.

But while some eras and some topics lack abundant primary sources, others have almost too many, often more than any single historian can read and analyze. Under such conditions it can be tempting to cherry pick sources and create a narrative of one’s own choosing, but good historians must read widely and maintain an open but critical mind to discover patterns and produce historical insights.

Is Facebook making us lonely essay discussion analysis

/in /by

This is a paper that is focusing on analyzing is Facebook making us lonely essay discussion. The paper also provides additional information to use in writing this assignment paper clearly.

Is Facebook making us lonely essay discussion analysis

For this essay you will be analyzing “Is Facebook making us lonely” by Stephen Marche and “Impression Management in a Networked Setting” by Danah Boyd. How are the two essays similar in terms of their analysis and criticism of the negative aspects of technology and our cultural obsession with being online and being busy? How do they differ in their analysis and how they argue their points as well as view the difference now between being “online” and “offline”? Which in the end makes a stronger argument? How so?

When you are writing your essay, you should be aware of the following:

Introduction: What is the power of technology and our current technological obsession with being clearly busy online and what are the dangers? What two essays are being analyzed?
Thesis statement = how are the ideas and arguments in the two essays is similar and different, and which essay of the two makes a stronger argument?
Body paragraphs (I would like to see 4 or 5): Compare similar points made in both essays (use quotes) and analyze how one is superior to the other.
Conclusion: Which essay was superior in its overall argument and points made? What does it say about our society and the dangers of our obsession with technology and life on and offline?

BASIC REQUIREMENTS:

Your essay should be type in a 12-point font (Times New Roman)
Please type your name, my name, English 1A, and the due date in the upper left-hand corner of the essay.
Please double space.
The minimum length is at least 3 full pages

Select an appropriate analytic procedure to code your interview data

/in /by

Select an appropriate analytic procedure to code your interview data. Code your data using a qualitative data analysis program or by hand in a separate document.

Select an appropriate analytic procedure to code your interview data

Analysis and Interpretation Worksheet
Part I: Analysis and Interpretation

Interview Data:

1.     Select an appropriate analytic procedure to code your interview data.
2.     Code your data using a qualitative data analysis program or by hand in a separate document. This process must identify: (1) codes and themes, (2) sub-codes, (3) categories, and (4) subcategories.
a.     Discuss your approach to coding the interview data. What procedure(s) did you select? Justify your response.
Click or tap here to enter text.
3.     Examine the results of your analytic procedure(s).
a.     Identify 2 or 3 initial assertions based on your interpretation of the interview data. Discuss how you arrived at each assertion.
Click or tap here to enter text.
b.    Synthesize your initial assertions into a key assertion about the central phenomenon in your mock study.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Observation Data:

1.     Review the Observation Guide you completed in Week 6, paying attention to your field notes and detailed narrative passages.
2.     Compose 2 or 3 analytic memos triggered by your field notes.
a.     Memo 1:
Click or tap here to enter text.
b.    Memo 2:
Click or tap here to enter text.
c.     Memo 3:
Click or tap here to enter text.
3.     Compose a meta-memo that synthesizes the primary elements from your analytic memos into a new whole.
Click or tap here to enter text.
4.     Examine the results of your analytic procedure(s).
a.     Identify 2 or 3 initial assertions based on your interpretation of the observation data. Discuss how you arrived at each assertion.
Click or tap here to enter text.
b.    Synthesize your initial assertions into a key assertion about the central phenomenon in your mock study.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Part II: Reflection

Write a 700- to 1,050-word reflective essay about your experience applying qualitative research methods and the knowledge you have gained from this course. Include your essay in the space below.

Click or tap here to enter text.

Selling donating or trading of human organs essay

/in /by

This is a paper that is focusing on the selling donating or trading of human organs. The paper also provides additional directions to use in writing the assignment paper well.

Selling donating or trading of human organs

Selling, Donating or Trading of Human Organs
Write a 1,500-1,750-word essay using five to seven academic resources in which you argue that a contested “case”involving the sale, trade, or donation of human organs fits (or does not fit) within a given category. A case may include a specific news article, story, or incident illustrating a dilemma or controversy relating to the exchange of human organs. The case does not need to be a court case.

Directions

Follow these steps when composing your essay:

1.     Firstly, start by selecting a controversial case found in the media involving the sale, trade, or donation of human organs. For example, an appropriate case might include a story in the news about an organ broker, and the term to define might be “criminal.”
2.     Secondly, decide what category you think your case belongs in. With the understanding that others may disagree with you about the definition of your category. Also, and/or whether your chosen case matches your category.
3.     Thirdly, in the opening of your essay, introduce the case you will examine and pose your definition question. Do not simply summarize here. Instead, introduce the issue and offer context.

4.     Fourthly, to support your argument, define the boundaries of your category (criteria) by using a commonly used definition or by developing your own extended definition. Defining your boundaries simply means naming the criteria by which you will discuss your chosen case involving the sale, trade, or donation of human organs. If you determine, for example, that an organ broker is a criminal, what criteria constitute this? A criminal may intentionally harm others, which could be one of your criteria.
5.     Lastly, in the second part of your argument (the match), show how your case meets (or does not meet) your definition criteria. Perhaps by comparing or sizing up your controversial case to other cases can help you to develop your argument.

Book Review Cooking in Other Women’s Kitchen: Domestic Workers in the South 1860-1960

/in /by

Book Review Cooking in Other Women’s Kitchen: Domestic Workers in the South 1860-1960. The book review needs to do the following Tell what the book is about.

Book Review Cooking in Other Women’s Kitchen: Domestic Workers in the South 1860-1960

Firstly, the book review needs to do the following Tell what the book is about.

Secondly, do not simply summarize the story, but give the topic, geographic area, and time span that the book covers. This should take only one mid-length paragraph.

Thirdly, give the book’s key argument/point.

Further, discuss the book’s sources and methodology: what kind of evidence and methods the author uses to make his/her point.

Additionally, analyze if the argument hold water.

Moreover, is the point well-made and supported with solid evidence and reasoning?

Finally, If you were a juror, would you buy the author’s argument/point or not?  Why or why not. Your take. What did you think about the book?  Did it interest or entertain you?  Was it well written and clearly organized?  This is the only openly subjective part of your review

More details:

Hendley on Sharpless, ‘Cooking in Other Women’s Kitchens: Domestic Workers in the South, 1860-1960’

Research on female domestic workers, past and present, is an important and growing field of scholarship. The stories of these workers, many of whom are women of color and/or immigrants, have been documented by historians, sociologists, and feminist or ethnic studies scholars alike.[1] Rebecca Sharpless’s book, Cooking in Other Women’s Kitchens: Domestic Workers in the South, 1865-1960, contributes to this body of research by providing an engaging glimpse into the work and family lives of African American female cooks in the post-Emancipation South.

As enumerated by Sharpless, the book has three main purposes: 1) to investigate how African American women transitioned from slavery to employment through domestic work; 2) to examine how these cooks managed to survive despite discrimination and difficult working conditions; and 3) to counter popular stereotypical images of African American cooks. Using sources including letters to New Deal agencies, interviews from the Federal Writers’ Project and the “Living Atlanta” oral history project, autobiographies, and cookbooks, Sharpless follows through on her goals.

Critique analytic methods to implement the best evidence for practice

/in /by

This is a paper that is focusing on the critique analytic methods to implement the best evidence for practice. The paper also provides additional guidelines to use in writing the assignment paper clearly.

Critique analytic methods to implement the best evidence for practice

Course Goals

By the conclusion of this course, student will be able to:

1. Firstly, critique analytic methods to critically appraise existing literature and other evidence to determine and implement the best evidence for practice.

2. Secondly, design and implement processes to evaluate outcomes of practice, practice patterns, and systems of care within a practice setting, health care organization, or community against national benchmarks to determine variances in practice outcomes and population trends.

3. Thirdly, design, direct, and evaluate quality improvement methodologies to promote safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care.

4. Fourthly, apply relevant findings to develop practice guidelines and improve practice and the practice environment.

Critique analytic methods to implement the best evidence for practice

5. Also, apply information technology and research methods appropriately to:

1. Collect appropriate and also accurate data to generate evidence for nursing practice

2. Inform and guide the design of databases that generate meaningful evidence for nursing practice

3. Analyze data from practice

4. Design evidence-based interventions

5. Predict and analyze outcomes

6. Examine patterns of behavior and also outcomes

7. Identify gaps in evidence for practice

6. Function as a practice specialist/consultant in collaborative knowledge-generating research.

7. Lastly, disseminate findings from evidence-based practice and research to improve healthcare outcomes.

Source: AACN. (2006). The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice.

Remember, ensure  that the paper is at least three pages exclusive of the cover and the reference pages. Also, ensure that you include all the references you use in finding research for this assignment paper. References should be at least three for the paper. All references, citation, and writing should follow the APA formatting and styling guidelines. Finally, ensure you focus on the assignment topic in detail.

Ensure that you follow the instructions provided keenly. Marking of the assignment is on how you do the task and how you submit the assignment too. In case of any question feel free to ask your instructor for more guidelines before doing the assignment.

Exploring synergies between oil and gas and renewables sectors

/in /by

Energy system integration of offshore energy: exploring synergies between oil and gas and renewables sectors. The offshore wind and Oil & Gas sectors are historically largely separate

Exploring synergies between oil and gas and renewables sectors

Energy system integration of offshore energy: exploring synergies between oil and gas and renewables sectors
The offshore wind and Oil & Gas sectors are historically largely separate. This project seeks to exploit synergies between the two in order to reduce the costs associated with O&G abandonment. Specific objectives are to:

Firstly, Identify hotspots where the two sectors, have the strongest synergies, e.g. hub locations

Secondly, Assess the potential to exploit existing O&G infrastructure, e.g. for O&M, CCS, geothermal energy and/or hydrogen

Thirdly, Analyze how the planned, staged abandonment could optimally be aligned with offshore wind developments

Fourthly, Assess the potential for cost reductions achievable through the above insights

The project will explore specific scenarios, for example:

a) Offshore hydrogen production (at O&G facility) + O&G as electricity hub for offshore wind – conversion of pipeline to hydrogen to send hydrogen to shore.

b) Offshore CCS + O&G as electricity hub for offshore wind – conversion of pipeline for CO2 transport + transmission line in parallel – hydrogen onshore with district heating.

c) Offshore hydrogen production/storage/fuel cell + O&G as electricity hub for offshore wind/transmission line to shore
The method is energy systems analysis, which takes real-world data on the offshore energy system to create an accurate model. Building on existing work in this area (e.g. offshore wind), existing datasets and models should be extended to include offshore O&G assets and abandonment schedules.

You can do calculations in Excel (no need for software)

Cultural developments and predisposing techniques

/in /by

This is a paper that is focusing on the Cultural developments and predisposing techniques. The paper also provides additional information to use in writing this assignment paper well.

Cultural developments and predisposing techniques

A paper on “territorial transformation” will focus on urban development in the 19thcentury.

In the paper below you will have to follow many of the points made by Kenneth Frampton in Part 1, Cultural developments and predisposing techniques: 1750-1939, from Modern Architecture: A Critical History.

For example, what was the medieval European town like?

Why did it become obsolete?

How did the European medieval town/or cities like Bombay transform?

What were the urban conditions in nineteenth-century cities?

What transformations took place, and how did urban planning evolve? How did colonialism play a role in the way cities were shaped during this era?

Going earlier, you could look at the Laws of the Indies, or the transformation of Tenochtitlan into Mexico City.

Case studies: Paris, Barcelona, London, Vienna, and Bombay (From A Global History of Architecture)!!!!!!!!!

You can also discuss movements – The Garden City movement, the City Beautiful Movement (also from Global)

Remember, ensure  that the paper is at least three pages exclusive of the cover and the reference pages. Also, ensure that you include all the references you use in finding research for this assignment paper. References should be at least three for the paper. All references, citation, and writing should follow the APA formatting and styling guidelines. Finally, ensure you focus on the assignment topic in detail.

Ensure that you follow the instructions provided keenly. Marking of the assignment is on how you do the task and how you submit the assignment too. In case of any question feel free to ask your instructor for more guidelines before doing the assignment.

Identify conversations about perspectives and evidence

/in /by

This is a paper that is focusing on Identify conversations about perspectives and evidence. The paper also provides additional guidelines to use in writing this assignment paper well.

Identify conversations about perspectives and evidence

Submit a  Research Review/ Synthesis

Research Question: Can stress during pregnancy cause Autism ?

You will develop a research review/ synthesis essay that will identify the key positions and perspectives within the scholarly and academic texts you have gathered. Show how these positions and perspectives are related to one another, and present a coherent narrative about what the research reveals about the conversation surrounding your chosen topic. In short, you will be describing the conversation surrounding your research question without yet entering that conversation.

You will continue researching your topic until you have found between five and seven scholarly and academic texts that contribute to your understanding of the issue you are researching. You will need to read your sources carefully and critically, making note of the key perspectives and evidence that each source uses.

Identify conversations about perspectives and evidence

As you read each source, do the following:

Identify conversations about perspectives and evidence related to your issue
Find central concepts repeated in multiple sources
Find broad themes discussed in your sources
Also, find agreements and disagreements among your sources
Find recurring voices in your sources

Once you have analyzed your research in this way, you are ready to begin synthesizing the conversation.

As you continue your research, consider compiling a working bibliography or works cited page with your sources. Once you have completed a thorough analysis of your research, you can begin organizing and drafting your research review essay.

The purpose of a research review is to identify the key issues and perspectives within the information you have gathered. Show how these issues and perspectives are related to one another. Develop a coherent, overall idea of what your research reveals about the conversation surrounding your chosen topic.

Your research review essay will analyze and synthesize the research you have found on your topic. (you should include five to seven scholarly and academic sources). Your essay will identify and represent fairly the different viewpoints concerning your issue. Summarizing the way an author presents his or her findings is necessary and important because it informs your audience that you are knowledgeable about this subject and know the research well. Moreover, synthesizing what you have learned from your various sources shows that you understand how to see the “big picture” of your issue and know the complexity and scope of the conversation you will be entering.

Essay Guidelines

Your essay should:

Clearly identify the different perspectives surrounding your issue.
Be organized around those perspectives, rather than organized around each source.
Contain a minimum of five to seven scholarly and academic sources. At least two of those sources must be scholarly.
Contain specific (direct quotation, paraphrase, summary) references to your sources.
Reference multiple sources to describe each perspective.
Follow the guidelines of a recognized documentation style (such as MLA, APA, or CMS) for in-text citations and the works cited page.
Be formatted in accordance with a recognized documentation style and be approximately five to six pages (1500 to 1800 words) in length.

Spending Plan Option project assignment analysis

/in /by

This is a paper that is focusing on the Spending Plan Option project assignment analysis. The paper also provides additional guidelines to use in writing the assignment paper well.

Spending Plan Option project assignment analysis

Class Project 2 –
Spending Plan Option
Your paper will be comprised of 3 sections:  an explanation of the creation of your spending plan, a discussion section, and also a question section.  Please use headings to help organize your paper.

1.         Section 1: Explanation of Plan
•           Explain the process of creating your plan.  Explain your numbers and why you made the changes you did.  For example, you will say: I spent this much on this, and this much on that, and this was interesting, and that was shocking, etc.  The explanation section will be the majority of your paper.
•           As you report your numbers in your spending plan, if it makes sense to you, it will make sense to me.

2.         Section 2: Discussion
•           Discuss relevant issues regarding spending plans.
•           Reference the Spending Plan article in the reading packet (Section 3).  Incorporate the ideas listed there, both when you create your plan and also when you explain your plan in this section.

3.         Section 3: Thought Questions
•           Answer the following questions (with headings). Use the question itself as the heading.
How do you feel about having/creating a spending plan?
Were these months typical of your spending?  If not, how did you account for the abnormality in your yearly projections?
How are you going to reallocate your spending in the future?  In other words, how are you going to change how you have been spending in the past?
Additionally, what was the most interesting thing you learned about yourself in the creation of your spending plan?
How will having a spending plan affect your future?
How will having a spending plan affect your immediate family?
Also, how will having a spending plan affect society?  In other words, if every American had a spending plan, what effect would that have on the economy?

Project Grading Details:
o          Your grade will be based on (see rubric below)
1.         Firstly, accurate completion of the spending plan and clarity of the explanation
2.         Secondly, thorough discussion of relevant issues to spending
3.         Thirdly, insightful answers to required thought questions
4.         Fourthly, ability to follow all of the directions and include all of the relevant material
5.         Lastly, grammar = complete sentences, proper punctuation, no misspelled words, etc.