“Exploring the use of mediation in managing conflict between Prison Officers and inmates in the Trinidad and Tobago Prison Service”

You are doing the literature review of the research proposal Please note that this is a Qualitative Study The Research Questions That are to be used are What are the experiences faced by both Prison Officers and inmates in managing conflict in the Trinidad and Tobago prison Service? Moreover, four other sub-questions are going to be responded through this investigation:

1. What are the risk factors exclusive to each violence type and appropriate mediation method that is going to tackle the problem?

2. What are the experiences of prison officers through conflict with prisoners?

3. What challenges will prison authorities experience upon implementing the conflict management mechanism? 4. What is the extent that mediation practices could facilitate conflict management among Prison officers and Prisoners?

 You are to use 25 peer review Journals to complete this Literature Review

 The sub- questions are to be done under themes please

 You must start the Literature review with a Brief introduction and summarize at the end of the introduction

 Just like the sample you need to do a brief summary at the end of each of the sub research questions

 All Statistics used must not be more than 5 years old

 The literature review must be in chronological order, must be arranged in patterns

 Please start with a global overview of the problem first please thank you, then developing countries

 Literature Review 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ny_EUJXHHs 2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IUZWZX4OG 3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCh_3VqwTnI The style of referencing is Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition).

Critical Thinking Assignment (115 points) As you know, healthcare in Saudi Arabia is changing drastically. Analyze the policy plans developed by the Ministry of Health. Evaluate measures that can assist the Ministry of Health in preventing the spread of outbreaks of disease.

Future Trends in KSA Healthcare and Policy

In your paper be sure to address: Specific KSA policies and regulations preventing disease outbreaks Metrics that can be utilized in limiting infectious disease outbreaks Trends that might impact policies and regulations in controlling infectious disease and How policy should be modified Conclusions References Your paper should meet the following structural requirements: Be three or four pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages. Be formatted according to APA writing guidelines. Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of four scholarly articles. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but two must be external. Utilize headings to organize the content in your work.

Research Proposal – What factors impact the amount and diversity of human trafficking seen globally

What factors impact the amount and diversity of human trafficking seen globally

Formatting Requirements: Your proposal should be 12-15 pages, typed. It should be double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font using 1-inch margins. All citations should be in APA style. The paper should have a cover sheet with your name and the title of the paper. Be certain to number the pages in your paper as well.

Finally, do not forget the reference page. Outline of Research Proposal The proposal should be organized as follows: I. Title The title of your research proposal is important as it is the first thing that most readers will consider when reviewing your proposal. Your title should mention your central variables of interest (i.e., independent and dependent variables). II. Abstract A short abstract (100-125 words) is adequate. An abstract is a summary that provides an overview of the proposal. Consider limiting yourself to these topics: (1) the problem area and need for additional research in this area, (2) research purposes, questions, or hypotheses and their importance, (3) relationship to the existing literature, (4) the type of research being proposed, and (5) types of policy implications that might result from the findings. The abstract should be page 2 of your research proposal. III. Introduction State your research problem or issue and why it is important. This is where you emphasize the importance of your research. The bulk of this section will come from your graded Assignment 1. Be sure to incorporate any edits or corrections that were suggested.

This will begin on page 3 of your proposal. IV. Literature Review Create an abridged literature review on your topic. The review should include at least 5 peer-reviewed studies but no more than 8. Make sure your literature review covers only previous studies directly relevant to the main topic of your proposal. The fact that an article is on the same general topic as yours is not sufficient reason to review it. Instead, focus on prior work that has looked specifically at the same (or very similar) topic as yours. The purpose of the review is to integrate and synthesize the major and foundational literature on your topic from scholarly, peer-reviewed journals. In other words, make sure you discuss the major findings of this body of research and describe to the reader all of the major developments in this research area. What have others said about the topic? What theories address it, and what do they say (if applicable)? What research has been done? Are the findings consistent or do past studies disagree? Are there flaws in the body of existing literature that you feel you can remedy? Describe to the reader how all of the literature “fits together.” Remember, writing a review of the literature requires more than just listing and summarizing studies that relate to the research question.

Conclude this section with your research hypotheses, taken from Assignment 2. The literature review section of your research proposal should be approximately 3-5 pages in length and describe the key theories (if applicable) and findings related to the study topic. Ideally, the majority of work cited should be published within the last 5 years (with the exception of foundational literature). V. Methods A. Sampling- Describe to the reader how you propose to sample from the population of interest. Whom do you want to be able to draw conclusions about? Who will be observed for that purpose? Use your Assignment 3 here. Be sure to incorporate any edits or corrections that were suggested. B. Measurement- What are the key independent and dependent variables in your study? How will you define and measure them? Do your definitions and measurement methods duplicate or differ from those of previous research on the topic? Are you using measures with established validity and reliability? Use part of your Assignment 2 here where applicable (i.e. not hypotheses). Be sure to incorporate any edits or corrections that were suggested. C. Research Design- What type of research design do you propose using to answer your research question? How well does this design suit your research question? What, if any, variables will you control for in the analysis to reduce the risk of spurious or intervening relationships? Use your Assignment 4 here. Be sure to incorporate any edits or corrections that were suggested. VI. Discussion Summarize the previous sections (III-V), making sure to emphasize the importance of your research question. How does your research build on existing research? What are some of the limitations of your research methodology (e.g., ability to measure key concepts, ability to address causal order issues, sampling issues, etc.). What do you think might be some important policy implications of the study?

You are working within an Emirati intelligence unit (counter terrorism) responsible for partnering with United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Customs and Border Protection (CBP). You are responsible for proactive and reactive assessments relevant to your mission to assist the DHS with border security in the state of Texas-Southwest Border Area (SWBA). You have just received direct orders to prepare a strategy for dealing with the drug cartel and terrorist threat in your assigned Area of Responsibility (AOR) in the near term and medium term (present to three years into the future). Your point of contact (customer) in the DHS-CBP consumes intelligence information by reading reports and analyzing the use of structured analytic techniques and related analytic frameworks. Given he is an American, direct statements and less formality are preferred means of communication. Therefore, you must provide a 2500-word assessment excluding front matter (cover page) and end matter (bibliography). You will also present your assessment as a short 10-minute brief. GRADING OF YOUR ASSESSMENT: 1. Research and exploitation of information streams. You will be graded for the quality of research conducted to obtain critical information related to the security threat in the SWBA-Texas (USA). (See below 4.1). 2. Comprehensiveness. You will be graded on the quality of writing to include a 10-page minimum (2500 words) that does not include cover page, front matter, and bibliography. 3. Accountability. Your assessment must have a cover page, clear introduction and thesis (executive summary, and a body with logical points organized effectively, and finally a clear conclusion briefly stating what courses of action should be taken given the lessons learned. You must also include a bibliography demonstrating your skill at selecting sources and exploiting information streams. 4. The Use of Analytic Tools. The use of analytic tools is mandatory for this assignment given the way that your customer/supervisor consumes intelligence, and the need for quality intelligence analysis of the counter terrorism threat. The following tools must be included in the body of your intelligence assessment and must also include discussion along with the graphics/techniques. 4.1 INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH. The intelligence assessment must demonstrate intelligence research approaches evident in the synergy of diverse information streams: • PRACTITIONER VIEWS. The use of expert and experienced Counter Terrorism and security perspectives. • AVERSARY VIEWS. The exploitation of adversary documents, speeches, websites, YouTube, Twitter, etc. is critical. • LOCAL VIEWS. The assessment must contain local perspectives and information to gain critical tactical information. • SCHOLARLY VIEWS. History, comparative analysis, theoretical, and other qualities are thus important from the scholarly community. 4.2. ORIENTATION AND AWARENESS. Using Structured Analytic Techniques like the Starburst Methods or PESTLE (or both together) is critical for gaining Situational Awareness. You can also use the Morphological Analysis Tool. 4.3. THREAT ASSESSMENT. The use of the CARVER threat analysis or another model of your choice is mandatory. 4.4. INSTRUMENTS OF POWER MODELS (IOP). The exercise involves assessing and countering terrorism and there for the application of an IOP model is essential. 4.5 AREA ANALYSIS TOOLS. The use of one or more area analysis tools is mandatory. 4.6 ANTICIPATION ANALYSIS TOOLS. The assessment must contain the use of at least one anticipation analysis tool. You can use the morphological analysis tool or the What If Analysis tool. Similar are tools including the STEEP+2 method, the High Impact-Low Probability Tool, and Forced Comparison Methods. Also i will present that assessment as a short 10-minute brief. if you have any questions pl let me know!!!!!