Archive for category: Healthcare Assignment Help

Paper details:

According to studies undertaken by the US Department of Agriculture, the price elasticity of demand for cigarettes is between – 0.3 and – 0.4 and the income elasticity is about + 0.5. Suppose Congress, influenced by studies linking cigarette smoking to cancer, plans to raise the excise tax on cigarettes so the price rises by 10%. Estimate the effect that the price increase will have on cigarette consumption and consumer spending on cigarettes (in percentage terms). A few states and cities across the United States have imposed a soda tax or a sugar tax on soft drinks, to reduce overall sugar consumption. In most forms, the tax is designed to discourage the production, importation, and purchase of carbonated, uncarbonated, sports and energy drinks with excess levels of added sugar. This kind of tax is a matter of public debate and often strongly opposed by food and beverage producers. Advocates promote this tax as an incentive to cut down on unhealthy diets and offset the growing economic costs of obesity. Do you support a sugar or soda tax? If so, why? If not, why not? Please discuss in detail by showing solid economic reasons to support your view. Is analytical in nature so there is no strict format requirement or minimum words requirement.

Paper details:

Read the attached article about a case of medical malpractice that resulted in further complications in a 12-year-old boy. The child fell and had a laceration on his knee and was treated by a nurse practitioner. Based on the article answer the following questions: 1. Explain subjective and objective information for this patient. (15 points) 2. Critique the medications prescribed for this child’s condition. Explain what may have been more appropriate to prescribed. (15points) 3. Outline the teaching the nurse practitioner should have given to the parents for this child. (15points) 4. Hypothesize how this malpractice lawsuit could have been avoided. (20points) Standard English: Spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraph formation, and paper formation used. (5points) References: At least 2-3 current (in the past 5 years), relevant, and sufficient scholarly sources beyond textbooks. (5points) APA/Formatting: Formatted in APA (6th ed.) style to include the references. Keep to one page either one sided or a trifold. May include graphics. (10points) PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS HERE IS THE CASE STUDY IF YOU CANT OPEN THE LINK ABOVE: WEEK 7: Legal Case Study Nurse Practitioners Medical Malpractice Case Study with Risk Management Strategies Case Study: Failure to identify and address concerns or questions regarding patient care; failure to complete documentation in a timely manner; failure to act as the patient’s advocate; failure to maintain clinical competencies; failure to follow the standard of care. This case study involves a licensed nurse practitioner working in a walk-in clinic. Indemnity Settlement Payment: Policy limits. (Monetary amounts represent only the payment made on behalf of the insured nurse practitioner) Legal Expenses: In excess of $230,000 Summary The pediatric patient was a 12-year-old male brought into a walk-in clinic by his parents shortly after falling and lacerating his knee. The patient sustained a six centimeter elliptical laceration above his right knee. The patient was examined by the nurse practitioner who documented a normal physical examination, except for evidence of a six centimeter elliptical laceration. The nurse practitioner cleansed the site with Betadine, anesthetized the area and sutured the wound using nylon sutures. The patient was discharged with a prescription for acetaminophen with codeine and a prescription for augmentin, although the healthcare information record stated he was allergic to penicillin. The nurse practitioner did not counsel the parents on dressing or wound care at discharge, but communicated to follow up in 7-10 days for suture removal. The mother filled the antibiotic prescription, but only gave the child one dose after she noticed that a skin rash was resulting. Later, she testified in her deposition that she neither called the walk-in clinic nor the nurse practitioner about a new antibiotic for the child. Two days after the fall, he was admitted to the local hospital with a diagnosis of cellulitis, possibly due to methicillin resistant staphlococcus aureus (MRSA) and was given intravenous antibiotics. Three days after the fall, his right extremity appeared edematous, slightly discolored and he complained of pain with movement. He was taken to surgery with a diagnosis of an abscess of the right thigh. During the operation, the sutures were removed with serosanguinous drainage noted. The tissue surrounding the wound appeared gray and discolored. Four days after the fall, his extremity appeared completely discolored, severely edematous, and he had very limited movement. He was taken back to surgery for a reexploration, further debridement and insertion of a central venous catheter. After the re-exploration, the patient was transferred to a children’s hospital several miles away via helicopter for further treatment and observation. While in the children’s hospital, the patient underwent multiple fasciotomies and surgeries to repair and re-route muscles, tendons and ligaments to his extremity and sacral area due to the advancing necrotizing fasciitis. His condition continued to deteriorate, resulting in a comatose state responding only to painful stimuli. While in this comatose state, he was noted to have recurrent uncontrolled seizures. The patient slowly recovered. Six weeks after the injury occurred, he was discharged from the hospital with home health and wound care services. Following discharge, the child had to re-learn simple activities of daily living, e.g.,walking, running and bathing. Due to the seizures and coma, the child has encountered problems with emotional and intellectual development. The bacterial infection and subsequent treatment impaired movement with his right leg, requiring several skin graphs and physical therapy. Risk Management Comment There was no documentation on wound irrigations or discharge teaching. When the nurse practitioner learned of the patient’s hospital admission, she documented a self-serving addendum to the clinic’s healthcare information record. None of the defense expert reviewers fully supported the nurse practitioner’s care. It was determined that she failed to prescribe the appropriate antibiotic, failed to appropriately suture the wound and failed to irrigate the wound as standard protocol would require. Experts were also critical of the suturing technique that the defendant used. Their testimony noted that the sutures were too tight, creating an anaerobic environment which contributed to the growth of the necrotizing fasciitis.