Archive for category: Healthcare Assignment Help

Theory chosen is:

Theory of the peaceful end of life from standard of care for terminally ill patients by Ruland and Moore (1998), The writer should research and include more. Assignment Criteria: Middle Range Nursing Theorist Paper Theories are patterns that guide the thinking about, being, and doing of nursing.

Theories provide structure to nursing practice and research. Theories guide nursing practice, stimulate creative thinking, facilitate communication, and at the same time clarify purposes. A metaparadigm is a global concept of a disciple that identifies the primary phenomena of interest to that discipline. In nursing, the dominate phenomena within the science of nursing revolves around the concepts of humans, health, environment and nursing. Assignment Criteria: For this assignment select a middle range theory Using this theory, develop a scholarly paper that includes the following criteria:

Define the middle range theory and the purpose of the selected middle range theory. Define and discuss the nursing metaparadigm within the context of the selected middle range theory. a. Explain how the theorist employs and defines each of the four concepts that comprise the nursing metaparadigm within the selected middle range theory Explain the importance of the selected middle range theory in nursing practice. a. provide and discuss two examples of use of the selected middle-range theory from current practice The scholarly paper should be 4-5 pages excluding the title and reference pages. Include level 1 and level 2 headings. The paper should begin with an introductory paragraph that includes the purpose statement.

The introductory paragraph and purpose statement allow the reader to understand what the paper/assignment is going to address. The paper should include a conclusion. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’). Include a minimum of three references from professional peer-reviewed nursing journals (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) to support the paper. ***Historical references may be used as appropriate. (Definition of historical reference: reference to a well-known person, place event or literary work that adds meaning to the paper.) APA format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations). Submit the assignment to Turnitin Direct prior to the final submission to Canvas Review the originality report and make any needed changes prior to submitting.

Respond to the following questions in a narrative format.

Be sure to answer all of the questions.

This assignment should be between 5 and 10 pages, typed, double-spaced, and referenced according to APA style. If you refer to works other than the DSM, please cite your sources appropriately. You are expected to work independently on this assignment.

Please list the relevant bio-psycho-social facts of this case. Please list the strengths and competencies of this client.

Describe how the strengths and resources of this client can be used in assessing this client (rather than in providing treatment).

What is the DSM-5 diagnosis or diagnoses for the client? Use DSM5 terms and code numbers.

Include and describe all appropriate specifiers. What is your reasoning for each diagnosis you selected?

What diagnoses did you consider but eliminated?

What is the rationale for eliminating each one? What screening tool(s) would you use in your assessment of this client?

Why would you use this tool for this client?

Create a problem list for this client and make sure to include problems not captured by the mental health diagnosis.

Please reflect on your personal reaction to this client. What are the potential barriers to your ability to engage with this client? How competent do you feel about your assessment skills with this client? Please indicate your response by selecting a number from the following scale. What do you need to do to continue to strengthen your assessment skills in this area?

Make sure that sources are within 5 years old. Please follow the rubric. Week 1: Compare and Contrast Assignment Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is for learners to: Improve their knowledge base and understanding of disease processes in Neurology

Have the opportunity to integrate knowledge and skills learned throughout all core courses in the FNP track and previous clinical courses.

Demonstrate the ability to analyze the literature be able to perform an evidenced-based review of disease presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Demonstrate professional communication and leadership, while advancing the education of peers. Demonstrate the ability to take information from assigned readings and translate it into the way you would describe it to a patient or family member in your own words. Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to: Interpret subjective and objective data to develop appropriate diagnoses and evidence based management plans for patients and families with complex or multiple diagnoses across the lifespan. (CO 1) Develop management plans based on current scientific evidence and national guidelines. (CO 4) Due Date: Wednesday by 11:59 pm MT of Week 1 A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday of Week 1 at 1159PM MT, regardless of the number of days late.

NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0). A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days (3 days). NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)

Total Points Possible: 100 points Requirements: For Week 1 of the course there is no case study given to you by the Faculty. Instead you will be assigned two diseases to compare and contrast based on the first letter of your last name. This information will be posted in the Course Announcements under Week 1 Welcome as well as the “Assignment” portion of the Week 1 module and will change every session. A comparison and contrast assignment’s focus is to identify and explore similarities and differences between two similar diseases. The goal of this exploration is to bring about a better understanding of both diseases. Week 1 Part 1: Due Wednesday by 11:59PM MT MN You will research the two areas of content assigned to you and compare and contrast them in a discussion post.

NOTE: A comparison and contrast assignment is not about listing the info regarding each disease separately but rather looking at each disease side by side and discussing the similarities and differences given the categories below. Consider how each patient would actually present to the office. Paint a picture of how that patient would look, act, what story they would tell. Consider how their history would affect their diagnosis, etc. Evaluation of mastery is focused on the student’s ability to demonstrate specific understanding of how the diagnoses differ and relate to one another. Address the following topics below in your own words: Presentation Pathophysiology Assessment Diagnosis Treatment Compare and contrast the following diagnoses as assigned:

The goal of this assignment is for you to become familiar with some of the measures that could be used to assess MFT clinical outcomes.

After you have read the assigned readings, you are to find and critique one measure of one or more key constructs related to your PCF.

Select a measure that you would administer to your clients to guide your interventions and treatment planning. Good sources of measures in the NCU Library include EBSCOhost, Mental Measurements Yearbook with Tests in Print, ProQuest, PsychiatryOnline, and PsycTESTS.

You will complete the Measure Critique Form (found in the Week 5 Books and Resources area) for the measure you selected. Note that we have provided a sample critique (also in the Week 5 Books and Resources area) showing the level of detail expected on this critique.

Be sure to send an email to your instructor by Wednesday of the week the assignment is due, identifying one or more measures you are considering evaluating, so that he or she can provide guidance on the best one to use for this assignment. For example, you will not want to evaluate a psychological test like the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2), which MFTs in most states cannot administer nor interpret. Instead, you should search for a measure of couple and family functioning, although individual screening tests, like the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), may also be acceptable. Again, the measures you select should be relevant to your PCF, specialization, and clinical practice as an MFT.

Length: 6-8 pages Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts that are presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Be sure to adhere to Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy.