Archive for category: Healthcare Assignment Help

Health and Wellbeing: Advocacy and Practice Assignment 1 Weighting: 25% Due date: Tuesday (week 5) Suggested word limit: 1200 words Learning outcome This assignment assesses your understanding of the following learning outcome: • Identify how current factors shape the social health and wellbeing context, and impact the social health and wellbeing of people, familieswhānau, communities, and societies. Note: This assignment tests your knowledge of current factors only. Assessment instructions Part A – Social Health and Wellbeing Factors 15 marks (200 words) In Module 2, you watched a video titled, ‘Current challenges in the social health and wellbeing sector’, in which Marion Blake, CEO of Platform Trust, outlined some of the current complexities shaping social health and wellbeing in Aotearoa New Zealand today. You were invited to post a response, and to respond to other feedback in the online channel. This assignment re-visits and extends on this task. Choose two challenges from the video that are relevant to your personal or professional social health and wellbeing context. 1. Identify and describe both challenges. 5 marks 2. Explain why each challenge is relevant to your professional or personal social health and wellbeing context. 5 marks 3. Describe the impact of these challenges on people, families and/or whānau, communities and society. 5 marks Part B – Written Analysis 85 marks (1000 words) Explain three current factors that impact social health and wellbeing in Aotearoa New Zealand, at three different levels – individual, family and whanau, and communities or societal. 1. Identify and describe a current factor that influences the social health and wellbeing of individuals. Explain how this factor is relevant to your professional or personal social health and wellbeing context. (300 words) 27 marks 2. Identify and describe a current factor that influences the social health and wellbeing of whanau or families. Explain how this factor is relevant to your professional or personal social health and wellbeing context. (300 words) 27 marks 3. Identify and describe a current factor that influences the social health and wellbeing of communities and society. Explain how this factor is relevant to your professional or personal social health and wellbeing context. (300 words) 27 marks Referencing • Use APA referencing to provide four citations from the course material. 4 marks Marking schedule Assessment criteria Marks Recommended word count Part A: Current Social Health and Wellbeing Factors Two current challenges have been identified and described. 5 200 words – Student has explained why both challenges are relevant to their professional context or to a health and wellbeing context they are familiar with. 5 Student has described the impact of these two challenges on people, families and/or whānau, communities and society. 5 Part B: Written Analysis One current factor that influences the social health and wellbeing of individuals in Aotearoa New Zealand has been identified and described. The student has demonstrated professional or personal relevance of the factor. 27 1000 words – One current factor that influences the social health and wellbeing of whanau and families in Aotearoa New Zealand has been identified and described. The student has demonstrated professional or personal relevance of the factor. 27 One current factor that influences the social health and wellbeing of communities and society in Aotearoa New Zealand has been identified and described. The student has demonstrated professional or personal relevance of the factor.

Communicable diseases among IDUs

Your paper must include the following sections, each with the major headings as noted in bold/underline below and in the order specified. You can include subheadings as you see fit.

Significance (Suggested 4 pages—9 points total) • Background (2 points) o This section should include a succinct yet clear description of the health issue, incorporating relevant epidemiologic data to identify the severity and susceptibility of the problem and establish the evidence for the behavioral risk factors to be addressed in the intervention. This question should answer the question “Why is this health issue important?” • Target Population Needs Assessment (3 points) o Describe the target population and discuss all important factors that influence the target population’s intention toward the behavioral and health objectives, including a thorough analysis of social influences, cultural values, and economic situations, considering the entire ecological model, essentially taking a systems thinking approach and considering the multiple levels of influence on individual behavior. This section should answer the questions “Why is this target population a priority for the health issue described above?”; “What are the roots of the social/behavioral issue, and how are cultural values considered in the problem and/or potential solutions?” and “What are the audiences’ needs, assets and capacities?” • Objectives (4 points) o Immediate (Theory-Based) Objectives (2 points)  Briefly state a minimum of two SMART short-term objectives and describe how they are related to the behavioral objective. Explicitly explain how these objectives could be quantitatively measured. o Intermediate (Behavioral) Objective (1 point)  Briefly state your one SMART behavioral objective and describe how it is related to the health objective. One objective is required, but with approval students may submit two if their program warrants. Explicitly explain how the behavioral objective could be quantitatively measured. o Long T erm (Health) Objective (1 point)  Briefly state your one SMART health objective and why this objective is important to individuals in your target population. Explicitly explain how the health objective could be quantitatively measured. Theoretical Approach (Suggested 5 pages—9 points total) In this section, you should describe the theoretical model of behavior you chose fully. Introduce and define the theory for the reader, discuss its utility, its assumptions, and its uses in various health contexts, including your health issue. Discuss its role in informing the development of your intervention, specifically how it informs the activities within your intervention: Describe the components of the assigned theory you used (as well as the components you did NOT use, if any) to develop your program and the rationale for incorporating (or not). The goal is to use your chosen theory as comprehensively as possible. (3 points) • Describe all the elements and activities of your health intervention program and discuss how your intervention incorporates into its design the elements of your chosen theory. What are the tailored programmatic activities and strategies you will utilize to engage your target audience effectively? (3 points) • Describe how this proposed program is innovative compared to other programs that have been previously implemented. Think about the following questions when developing this section (though not necessary to discuss each and every one). (3 points) “How is this program different/better than other programs in this health context or for your target population?” “What is it about your particular program and theoretical approach that will make it successful among your target population?” Discussion (Suggested 3 pages—4 points total) This section should include both Limitations and a Conclusions section.

• For the limitations portion, consider strengths of your theory and justify your choice. Alternatively, consider whether another theory, or an additional theory, might have improved your intervention and discuss how it/they would have been used. At least one additional theory should be discussed here. (2 points) • Bring to light overall limitations of your intervention/program in addressing the health issue in this population. (1 point) • For the conclusion, end on a positive and persuasive note with the anticipated policy and/or program implications resulting from your program, despite its limitations. (1 point)

Paper is for a health law and policy in canada course at the graduate level (master’s) Topic idea i had was about organ donation in canada and proposal of presumed consent and what that means for consent or how policies at hospitals will be impacted or how consent is determined with minors A different topic could be health law and policies and privacy laws something with maybe health data being transmitted and sometimes saved in US servers along with the PHIPA.

Diabetes Type 2

This is an APA thesis paper.

Please add the in-text citation and add the references that you used in APA.

Please follow the instruction below for the body of my thesis.

Options The Background and Landscape sections serve as the preamble to this policy analysis and puts the research problem in context.

The options section is the heart of your paper. It is the analysis and should be detailed.

Each option should be weighted equally. Be sure to use the factors in box 3.2 in analyzing each option (Tietelbaum & Wilensky, 2013, p. 260). Tietelbaum and Wilensky (2013) suggest “three to five alternatives for your client to consider” (p. 259). Your team should provide the positive and negative aspects (i.e., pros and cons) for each alternative.

This is what the authors deem “a balanced analysis”. They also suggest selecting between three and five criteria to run the pro vs. con analysis. Some criteria include: cost, Return-on Investment, political feasibility, etc. It is important to remember that your client’s values and his/her ability to make (or not make) decisions (i.e., power) must be kept in mind when making your final recommendation. Organizing your list of options logically is extremely important.

The first sentence in each “Option” subsection should clearly describe that option. When analyzing each option consider the following:

• Cost: How much does each option cost?

• Cost-Benefit Analysis: Cost versus the value of each option

. • Political Feasibility: Are the options viable?

• Legal Implications: Are the options legal? What are the ramifications?

• Administrative Ease: How difficult would each option be to implement?

• Fairness: Does each option treat individuals affected fairly?

• Timeliness: Can each option be implemented in a timely reasonable fashion?

• Targeted Impact: Does each option actually target the problem/population involved (Tietelbaum & Wilensky, 2013, p. 260).

Option 1. Describe the option. What are the pros of this option? What are the cons of this option? Explain your argument briefly and concisely.

Option 2. Describe the option. What are the pros of this option? What are the cons of this option? Explain your argument briefly and concisely.

Option 3. Describe the option. What are the pros of this option? What are the cons of this option? Explain your argument briefly and concisely.

Option 4. Describe the option. What are the pros of this option? What are the cons of this option? Explain your argument briefly and concisely.

Your team may choose to insert brief tables in this section to illustrate how the team assessed each option. Make sure to keep the table content concise and brief, as tables are supposed to supplement your narrative. You might want to refer to the analytic side-by-side Table 13-2 appearing on page 261 of Tietelbaum and Wilensky’s textbook.