Space of contemporary forced migration

Space of contemporary forced migration

Write a critical engagement for the following article that interprets a space of contemporary forced migration using concepts and theories in emotional geography.

Article that interprets a space of contemporary forced migration

Write a critical engagement for the following article that interprets a space of contemporary forced migration using concepts and theories in emotional geography.

Article – “Schneiderman, S. (2013). Himalayan border citizens: Sovereignty and mobility in the Nepal-Tibetan
Autonomous Region (TAR) of China border zones, Political Geography, 35: 25-36” [See attached file]
Your engagement should also demonstrate sensitivity and critical awareness about nomenclature and representation within forced migration (i.e., think carefully about the words you use and define your terms).

In addition to your chosen reading (article), use between 4 and 6 other readings to inform your analysis.
Two of these should be from the emotional geography literature. The others should be from other sources on forced migration or your chosen type of space. See some of the reading list provided below:

More details;

Firstly, Anderson, K. and S. Smith (2001). Editorial: Emotional Geographies, Transactions of the Institute of British
Geographers, 26(1): 7-10.

Secondly, Davidson, J. and C. Milligan (2004). Embodying Emotion Sensing Space: Introducing Emotional
Geographies, Social and Cultural Geography, 5(4), 523-532.

Thirdly, Bauder, H. (2015). Perspectives of Open Borders and No Border, Geography Compass, 9/7, 395-405.

Fourthly, Dickson, A. (2015). Distancing Asylum Seekers from the State: Australia’s evolving Political Geography of
Immigration and Border Control, Australian Geographer, 46(4): 437-454.

Further, Ho, E. (2017). Mobilising affinity ties: Kaching internal displacement and the geographies of humanitarianism at the China-Myanmar border, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42: 84-
97.

Also, Jones, R. and C. Johnson (2016). Border militarisation and the re-articulation of sovereignty, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41: 187-200.

Additionally,  Or other sources which are relevant. Write 1000 words (excluding the reference list and cover page). 2% will be deducted if you exceed 1400 words.

Lastly, Use 12-point font, 1.5 spacing, a LH margin of 4cm (for comments) and a RH margin of 2.5 cm.

Finally, Write in the first person. Use APA7 to format in-text references and reference list